Tom Fitton is the President of Judicial Watch out of Washington D.C. and the author of A Republic Under Assault, explains the secret agreements about the COVID-19 jabs.
IOJ’s highlighted key elements according to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in the above video:
“Freedom of information requests uncovered that in an email dated May 17th of 2021 a CDC official says internally that some of the providers that report to what's known as the VAERS system (the vaccine adverse event reporting system) that across the country the CDC was under the impression that many providers weren't even reporting post-vaccination cases of myocarditis, despite the requirement to do so under the emergency use authorization.”
“It's a reporter for The Epoch Times sharing them, and in them you can see CDC official, after official, after official getting notified that doctors around the country are seeing problems is with especially young people having these swollen hearts as a result of getting the covid vaccine.”
“We had some documents come out last week or earlier this week where our folks in the U.S Public Health establishment, the central advisory body for covid, about advising the government whether to approve it, or how to handle it, was communicating in December 2020 with their counterparts in the United Kingdom about anaphylactoid reactions.”
“In the emails they talk about sharing information, but both of them were concerned about this Mutual confidentiality agreement in the discussion.”
“So we've got a secret document about vaccine injury potentials. This is something that is incredibly disturbing, and then there's more information about the the issue of pregnancy in the vaccine, and you talk and and there we have a meeting with Ray Rochelle, presumably Rochelle Walinski, about if we should say anything or wait till we have more definitive information.”
“in other words it wasn't just the CDC that was downplaying the risk of myocarditis as a result of the jab, it was actually medical professionals across the country who were scared to actually include these reports in the very system. Well that's that's the key point, there was this chilling effect throughout the medical establishment that any doctor who raised anything about vaccines were targeted, they were they were fear of losing their jobs, and if they started tying Adverse Events to vaccination status is they were putting themselves and their jobs on the line and you could understand why these reports weren't being placed.”
“It was exceedingly frustrating because anyone who raised these issues separately was subject to censorship online at the behest of the CDC. So people were seeing this on the ground.”
“We didn't need the CDC to tell us that that was an issue, yet their Chief concern was covering it up and suppressing anyone who raised issues about it separately in good faith.”
Tom Fitton reasonably asks: “Why is it Judicial Watch that sue to get basic safety and efficacy information? Where's Congress why hasn't this been voluntarily released two years ago yes?”
“They're still hiding the information even to this day it is considered very taboo among medical professionals to even ask questions about this and there are a few brave souls that have done it very smart well credentialed people uh many of whom we've talked to here who are willing to stick their necks out but not without severe uh professional condemnation from the people around them”
“it's just it's amazing it is like it's a matter of it's almost like people are being treated as apostates as non-believers rather than as scientists as the scientific process”
“And if you don't know what the risks are you don't have informed consent. And certainly if you're pretending these Adverse Events aren't aren't as directly tied as they are, it certainly harms the medical treatment. You may be seeking or impair it in response to any actual adverse events that arise. Yeah I mean the dishonesty itself is destructive.”
See Original Story: Judicial Watch: Records Show U.S. and UK ‘Confidentiality Agreement’ Tied to Vaccine Adverse Events
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 57 pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that show, just two days prior to FDA approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, a discussion between U.S. and UK health regulators regarding the COVID shot and “anaphylaxis,” with the regulators emphasizing their “mutual confidentiality agreement.”
Judicial Watch obtained the records through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against HHS (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:22-cv-00660)) after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is an agency of HHS, failed to respond to an August 30, 2021, FOIA request for:
All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events, deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.
The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is the U.S. Government’s central advisory body, along with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), advising whether to approve COVID vaccines.
A lengthy, heavily redacted December 2020 email exchange shows U.S. and UK health officials placing a heavy emphasis on their “mutual confidentiality agreement” in a discussion regarding “anaphylactoid reactions” to the COVID vaccine.
The exchange is initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and is sent to Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock as well as Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). The subject line and body of the email are fully redacted under FOIA Exemption B3 (relating to statutory prohibitions).
As background, Mogford includes information on “two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions….” Marks replies to Mogford: “It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.” Mogford later replies, “… attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind – information shared under our confidentiality agreement.”
Marion Gruber, head of the Office of Vaccines Research and Review (OVRR), then replies to Mogford, “Thank you so much for this information. Our emails crossed. If possible, would be available for a t-con [teleconference] today?” The exchange concludes with OVRR Deputy Director Phil Krause advising UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency official Jamie Convisser, “Your summary is correct. I’m cc:ing Amanda Cohn at CDC who can provide the most up-to-date details about [redacted]. Obviously, [redacted], not all of this is public so please hold these details confidential.” Cohn then replies to Mogford, and includes an attachment titled “Anaphylaxis CLARK Dec 19 2020 Final”. She writes, “I am adding my colleagues Tom Clark and Stacey Martin, we are happy to share more information with you. Attached are slides that were presented at a public meeting on Saturday. [Redacted].”
The FDA issued its Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine for individuals 16 years of age and older on December 11, 2020.
On May 14, 2021, the CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with the subject line “Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.”
Gruber writes, “I am fine with this language.” Marks then responds to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi, “I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.” Cohn replies, “We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.”
“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.”
Judicial Watch is pursuing challenges against the agency’s redactions under FOIA.
In a previous production from this FOIA lawsuit, Judicial Watch received 1,081 pages of records from HHS detailing internal discussions about myocarditis and the COVID vaccine. Other documents detailed adverse “events for which a contributory effect of the vaccine could not be excluded.”
Through FOIA, Judicial Watch has uncovered a substantial amount of information about COVID-19 issues:
HHS records regarding data Moderna submitted to the FDA on its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, indicated a “statistically significant” number of rats were born with skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected with the vaccine. The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals.
FDA records detailed pressure for COVID-19 vaccine booster approval and use.
NIH records revealed an FBI “inquiry” into the NIH’s controversial bat coronavirus grant tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The records also show National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials were concerned about “gain-of-function” research in China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2016. The Fauci agency was also concerned about EcoHealth Alliance’s lack of compliance with reporting rules and use of gain-of-function research in the NIH-funded research involving bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China.
HHS records revealed that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the NIAID.
NIAID records showed that it gave nine China-related grants to EcoHealth Alliance to research coronavirus emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants to the Wuhan lab itself. The records also included an email from the vice director of the Wuhan Lab asking an NIH official for help finding disinfectants for decontamination of airtight suits and indoor surfaces.
HHS records included an “urgent for Dr. Fauci ” email chain, citing ties between the Wuhan lab and the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth Alliance. The government emails also reported that the foundation of U.S. billionaire Bill Gates worked closely with the Chinese government to pave the way for Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and help “raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from China on important international counsels as high level commitment from China.”
HHS records included a grant application for research involving the coronavirus that appears to describe “gain-of-function” research involving RNA extractions from bats, experiments on viruses, attempts to develop a chimeric virus and efforts to genetically manipulate the full-length bat SARSr-CoV WIV1 strain molecular clone.
HHS records showed the State Department and NIAID knew immediately in January 2020 that China was withholding COVID data, which was hindering risk assessment and response by public health officials.
University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) records showed the former director of the Galveston National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Dr. James W. Le Duc warned Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology of potential investigations into the COVID issue by Congress.
HHS records regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the COVID-19 vaccines showed a key component of the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.
Records from the Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) revealed safety lapses and violations at U.S. biosafety laboratories that conduct research on dangerous agents and toxins.
HHS records included emails between National Institutes of Health (NIH) then-Director Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, the director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), about hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19.
HHS records showed that NIH officials tailored confidentiality forms to China’s terms and that the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted an unreleased, “strictly confidential” COVID-19 epidemiological analysis in January 2020.
Fauci emails included his approval of a press release supportive of China’s response to the 2019 novel coronavirus.
Stay tuned for Part 2 coming soon.
IOJ found the Mutual Vaccine Confidentiality Agreements discussed in U.S. and U.K. regulatory emails…
Will we need to sue for humanity to see them? Probably.
IOJ is blessed to carry the responsibility of being one of upwards of only 10 lawsuits that includes authenticated testimony by Dr. Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer.
You are being called upon to help hold wrongdoers accountable.
You can support Interest of Justice in the mission to file multiple critically important global legal actions against WHO, FDA, CDC, EMA and wrongdoer States (including a solid claim for crimes against humanity) by blessing this mission with a generous donation today.
If you haven't signed the notice and demands yet, please go here to sign and share now!
Sign here and demand we Don’t Let Pfizer Get Away With The Greatest Crime In History! Give Global Notice Of: War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers’ Reports eBook: Data That Pfizer, FDA Tried to Conceal
Sign here to demand to stop the proposed IHR amendments
Sign Here to demand to stop vaccine passports
Sign here to support stop the ‘Pandemic Treaty’
Sign here to support IOJ’s CRIMINAL Charges for crimes against humanity and breach of ethics against key W.H.O. Staff Director General and Chief Scientist (and her successor Jeremy Farrar).
Sign here and demand IOJ’s OPEN LETTER & Questions Sent To Klaus Schwab. RE: DAVOS “Welcoming Remarks & Special Address”
Notice And Demand.Org (The main website hosting all the demands)
***More Actions Coming Soon!
DO YOU AGREE ITS TIME TO SUE THE W.H.O. FOR INTERNATIONAL WRONGDOING AND BREACH OF ETHICS & RESEARCH STANDARDS DUTIES?
Watch Interest of Justice Set Strict Limits For The W.H.O.:
Congress, Senate, POTUS are marching to a very dufferent tune that does not include protecting the Constitution.