Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DrMikeYeadon's avatar

Folks,

Do we know whether the injections are legally pharmaceuticals or merely “countermeasures” in CR?

I ask, because in USA at least, they aren’t pharmaceutical products. The PREP Act provides complete legal immunity from prosecution, provided a Public Health Emergency declaration is in force (it is) and the FDA has granted an Emergency Use Authorization.

Of course, what these law changes accomplished is to render the obviously unlawful, “legal on paper”.

Whether they then count as experimental or treatments in any way might determine whether their use breaches the Nuremberg Code.

To take an absurd example as illustration, a series of traffic cones are “countermeasures”, and no matter what assault on one’s freedoms their use represents, there’d be no breach of Nuremberg. Wrong category of product.

Despite it obviously being the case that these jabs are medical product-like, the distinction might be important and I recommend our lead lawyer be fully briefed on the impact of these mad redefinitions of products from medical intervention to countermeasures.

The relevant experts are in my opinion Katherine Watt & Sasha Latypova (both have excellent primers for new readers on their respective Substack accounts).

Best wishes

Mike

Expand full comment
Eris's avatar

All impostor actors of governments should be prosecuted for premeditated murder. once everyone knew that they were purchasing through secret contracts, with public money, products about which it was written in black and white that not many adverse effects were known (there is no such thing to produce something and not know what you are doing) and which were concluded with absurd conditions from the producers, so they were experimental products, they made false advertising for them, they blocked access to information and mixed the right to informed consent (which in real wasn't informed at all) with conditioning the development of all people's activities, they practically forced people to be injected not once but several times with these products, thus intentionally endangering their lives and health. what can we say about the absolute denial of the results of these injections, of reality and the adoption of a dictatorial position by these scoundrels. here, even today, everyone says that they would do the same thing again and that lives were saved. everything seems from a horror movie....

why didn't they inject the population with something that doesn't have any adverse effects? because it turned out, they admitted that against the spread of a disease they were not tested, so not that was the goal, so the intended result was their experimentation which had and will have disastrous effects.

Expand full comment
49 more comments...

No posts