Nuremberg Code IS LAW! Is that why the governments are pretending its just "public health research", but not an experiment? Let's ask a judge if FDA can really soften human experimentation like this!
Isn't the issue that these injections are NOT medical products but 'countermeasures' and that pharmaceutical manufacturers were merely contractors for DOD? That these 'countermeasures' or 'prototypes' have been regulated through an entirely different parallel legal structure than regular medical vaccines/products? That they want us to believe that these injections are vaccines but in fact they are countermeasures....a confusing word for weapons...in a war? So that the Nuremberg code is only applicable when it concerns medical experimentation and NOT the intentional maiming and killing of the population with 'countermeasures' during a war.
Precisely correct, but while critical to understand, it is only a limited view of the global legal reality-
To be clear, Sasha and Katherine are correct - which is why Sasha is testifying in our cases - BUT lets look from a wider vantage point:
See, the INFERIOR laws in the US disgustingly allow the FDA and their cohort EMA and WHO to do collective research to use pseudo legal twisting of words and get out of research standards, human rights protections and pretend to call them not clinical trials and not adulterated and not investigational... blah, blah - they twist so many words to trick us!
Its totally relevant about how US, UK, WHO, etc call them countermeasures and evade testing, etc, but its only part of the legal story..,
The bizarre limitation of US law twisting law and science is only applicable inside the borders of US, where US laws apply to the US product BEFORE EXPORT - Its a closed loop system
However, upon export the US and Costa Rica (CR) import law law is EXPLICIT:
The applicable and guiding laws change INSTANTLY upon export!
1. People need to get this clear:
When they are exported to developing countries, its exported with labels that must classify it as INVESTIGATIONAL.
side note: Under US laws of export its evil - the same INVESTIGATIONAL product sent out as INVESTIGATIONAL to CR, etc cannot be used in US.... RIDDLE US THAT!
2. People also need to get this key part clear:
Upon export the laws of US DO NOT APPLY. Only laws that ever apply to an exported drug, vaccine, etc are the laws of the country of import - so in our case the Costa Rican laws apply - NOT US laws - at all.
US tricked CR and hundreds of Treasuries the procurement contract was standard.
The CR Health Minister testified WHO and FDA are the source of vax authorizations, and the law therefore says they are responsible under international law.
If its a sham FDA authorization under DoD it will come out in discovery.
Under law of State and international organization responsibility the WHO & USA can be sovereign, but must still be responsible and it is so critical to understand -
Please remember this always:
Under law of responsibility which applies to ALL nations, the State and WHO can never, ever, ever use a national inferior law or internal WHO rule to evade an international obligation under ICCPR and Siracusa Principles to protect the international community as a whole from the crime against humanity of mass serious undue experimentation! Never. We MUST UNDERSTAND AND FIGHT FOR SUPERIOR & INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW WHERE OUR SOVEREIGNTY & PROTECTION LIES.
We are trying to get out from under these cases & get them all filed in order to help teach some civics, public diplomacy and legal strategies on how humanity can beat their inferior BS by rising as masters to a higher plane to crush them on their lower plane and nullify their pseudo law with real superior law that all countries agree on.
We the people of Earth do NOT allow toxic peace or war biological or eugenic experiments on civilians. It is an impermissible delict for states and a crime for people to do - it is abhorrent to civilization as a whole and impermissible! This experimentation is simply NOT Allowed under ICCPR and Siracusa Principles, etc!
No one has proven the truth of experimentation violating the Superior laws yet and no one has proven its a toxic experiment without informed consent yet, which is key to stopping the toxic countermeasures, so keep the faith we can fix this.
PS: DoD and HHS are days away from a default and we can sue them - We asked many key questions to stop them but to answer you - we also asked HHS if we are in a war because they had no "peacetime agreement between HHS and DoD for rollout of the covid vaccine" as required by law prior to the rollout (hmmmmm)
- and there are also two more defaults are coming from them soon we presume, and then we will have it set up to win and force them to stop the countermeasures.
PSS: HHS says they could not find any delegation of authority to send the experiments to CR or any country!!! They wont prevail. Hang tight - trying to clean it up.
Remember, there are always 5 sides to every story, especially when interpreting complex import export and international biomedical research laws - which are being strengthened such as last Dec 2022 in WHO documents - which call it an "unproven intervention outside clinical trials" which require a lot of extra ethics stuff they failed on by the way.... The WHO docs say its impermissible while the looters in the authorization room get rich off violating the ethics guidance as long as they can.
Thank you so much for this concise explanation! As a Canadian I have often wondered how this would apply for Canada and other countries. Ps. I had to read it twice and let it sink in for a few minutes. Thank you for everything you do. Thank you for helping us remember who we truly are and that nobody can take our rights to live as powerful, free human beings away from us.
Katherine Watt Bailiwick News and Sasha Latypova have extensively described and proven that these injections are countermeasures and do not require approval or clinical trials.
Please read the above comment we wrote about the difference of laws within US and how it COMPLETELY changes in our favor upon export and we can nail them for sending us some bunk ass INVESTIGATIONAL toxic crap they said was safe, but they knew wasn't! HERE its investigational - there in US its not.
see Pfizer fact sheet US - https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/ Bottom says: This site is intended only for U.S. healthcare professionals. The products discussed in this site may have different product labeling in different countries.
Here is Pfizer fact sheet GLOBAL https://www.cvdvaccine.com/ - and TA-DA - you will find it is damn well investigational in Costa Rica! How can you tell FOR SURE Dr. Yeadon? You will be shocked! Go to the Global fact sheet and try to find Costa Rica in the drop down menu.
If a country is not in the menu it is NOT approved by the country and Pfizer and FDA find it to be investigational in those countries NOT in the drop down like CR.
Here is from Pfizers Global fact sheet:
"Global Information About Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine (also known as BNT162b2 or as COMIRNATY)
The approval status of the Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine varies worldwide.
For countries where the relevant regulatory authority has not authorised the vaccine or has not authorised it for an age group listed below, the vaccine is investigational and its safety and efficacy have not been established.
Countries that have not authorised the vaccine will not be listed in the respective drop down below.
As information may vary by country, please choose below in which country you are a licensed healthcare professional or recipient/caregiver to access more information on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine."
Remember, the evil Mengele CR Health Minister & vaccination commission secretary both reluctantly testified its imported as investigational and even gave the court the import law art 117 health law - which FDA just so happens to be in violation of!
Then they LIED UNDER OATH IT WASN'T INVESTIGATIONAL to keep it going - which the prosecutor finally agrees is a lie... Sigh,... nightmare!
should it matter whether it was classified as a trial or not? as stated in Article 6 of the UNESCO universal declaration of bioethics and human rights 2005:
"any medical intervention whether preventative, therapeutic, or diagnostic must meet the terms of informed consent. the interested party (patient or legal proxy) can withdraw consent at any time for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice".
That is EXACTLY right! WHO calls covid "vax" an unproven intervention outside a clinical trial (needs extra ethics met) and Costa Rica signed UNESCO universal declaration of bioethics and human rights 2005.
Also see:
The UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights is written into our medical morality law right next to Nuremberg Code...
"The human genome is the complete set of genetic material of the human being. UNESCO regards the human genome as the “heritage of humanity”. UNESCO believes it should be protected and passed on to future generations and that advances in science need to be considered in the light of human rights.
The Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights was adopted unanimously and by acclamation at UNESCO's 29th General Conference on 11 November 1997. The following year, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the Declaration.
It has been cited in many academic and popular journals and has been referred to in numerous national and regional legislation on medicine, privacy and genetic research.. "
Costa Rica signed it - CR Constitution in CR says Art 7 - treaties are higher than constitution.
From the The Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights:
Article 4
The human genome in its natural state shall not give rise to financial gains.
B. Rights of the persons concerned
Article 5
(a) Research, treatment or diagnosis affecting an individual’s genome shall be undertaken only after rigorous and prior assessment of the potential risks and benefits pertaining thereto and in accordance with any other requirement of national law.
(b) In all cases, the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned shall be obtained. If the latter is not in a position to consent, consent or authorization shall be obtained in the manner prescribed by law, guided by the person’s best interest.
(c) The right of each individual to decide whether or not to be informed of the results of genetic examination and the resulting consequences should be respected.
(d) In the case of research, protocols shall, in addition, be submitted for prior review in accordance with relevant national and international research standards or guidelines.
(e) If according to the law a person does not have the capacity to consent, research affecting his or her genome may only be carried out for his or her direct health benefit, subject to the authorization and the protective conditions prescribed by law. Research which does not have an expected direct health benefit may only be undertaken by way of exception, with the utmost restraint, exposing the person only to a minimal risk and minimal burden and if the research is intended to contribute to the health benefit of other persons in the same age category or with the same genetic condition, subject to the conditions prescribed by law, and provided such research is compatible with the protection of the individual’s human rights.
Article 6
No one shall be subjected to discrimination based on genetic characteristics that is intended to infringe or has the effect of infringing human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity.
Article 7
Genetic data associated with an identifiable person and stored or processed for the purposes of research or any other purpose must be held confidential in the conditions set by law.
Article 8
Every individual shall have the right, according to international and national law, to just reparation for any damage sustained as a direct and determining result of an intervention affecting his or her genome.
Article 9
In order to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms, limitations to the principles of consent and confidentiality may only be prescribed by law, for compelling reasons within the bounds of public international law and the international law of human rights.
C. Research on the human genome
Article 10
No research or research applications concerning the human genome, in particular in the fields of biology, genetics and medicine, should prevail over respect for the human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity of individuals or, where applicable, of groups of people.
Article 11
Practices which are contrary to human dignity, such as reproductive cloning of human beings, shall not be permitted. States and competent international organizations are invited to co-operate in identifying such practices and in taking, at national or international level, the measures necessary to ensure that the principles set out in this Declaration are respected.
it doesn't matter much, at least not in this context. the nature of the intervention is secondary. there is a more basic legal principle at play here, re: basic fundamental human rights as currently recognized under int'l law. key provisions include (but are not limited to):
1. bodily autonomy and informed consent are fundamental human rights to be treated as inviolable.
2. consent cannot be obtained though force, violence, threat, deceit, duress, overreach, or any other form of constraint or coercion.
3. any medical intervention whether preventative, therapeutic, or diagnostic must meet the terms of informed consent
4. the interested party (patient or legal proxy) can withdraw consent at any time for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
5. these rights are to be recognized and upheld even in the events of national or global emergency, such as war, natural disaster, or pandemic.
these provisions are not only included in the Nuremberg codes, but also in:
- the Geneva conventions, the ICCPR 1966/76, the Helsinki declaration 1968 and successive Helsinki accords (most recent 2008), the Rome statutes 2003, and the UNESCO universal declaration of bioethics and human rights 2005.
the problems that were having here are not with the laws. the problem is that the entities normally tasked with prosecuting these crimes are the very ones committing them.
They are on their heels. We cannot lighten up one bit now. Now is push time. And we have put them on their heels u try utilizing the rule book they passed out; not ours.
I have no doubt that almost every aspect of the "Covid Experience was Illegal" in many ways.!
Also, the whole process was Immoral.
None of the so-called Democratic countries had any Mandate for imposing the "Vaccines" or other Draconian measures.
Futhermore, claiming these injections as being "Safe and effective" was an inexcusable fraud which should be prosecuted. Governments nolonger bother to refute the fact of massive "Vaccine related Mortality" (17 Million and counting). This might not meet the definition of Genocide(?). But, it certainly qualifies as "Mass Murder"!
Its all illegal and they just get away with it due to LOCKSTEP corrupt oversight. It's not actually genocide - its the crime against humanity of EXTERMINATION! Extremely similar, but genocide is due to religion, race, etc - this is somewhat indiscriminate. Its got to be proven and stopped as quickly as possible. Its the most insane evil thing in our lives and maybe human history! We are doing our best and it is NOT fast enough! Breaks our hearts - we have close family and parents dead from this!
We appreciate what you are doing! But, this needs more than the efforts of people like you. We need a broad 'Human' declaration of our value as individuals. We are not the "Chattels" of any Government or Self Appointed Authority!
BTW: There has never been a "Statute of Limitation" for Murder!
No statute of limitation on terrorism, genocide or crimes against humanity either! This is AWESOME!! We are actually starting Public Diplomacy and Multilateral diplomacy classes in 4 days - Malta gave us a partial scholarship. We want to use the knowledge and diplomacy certification to help draft a couple REALLY IMPORTANT declarations, manifestos and integrity pacts that we hope to do multilateral negotiations on and get signed by as many nations to help us. We are already certified in Diplomatic Law and Science Diplomacy... We will be announcing a lot of this stuff in a month or so - right now we are focused on the cases and fundraiser to file serious cases! We definitely are NOT their chattel! We are the law - they need to get a clue
Isn't the issue that these injections are NOT medical products but 'countermeasures' and that pharmaceutical manufacturers were merely contractors for DOD? That these 'countermeasures' or 'prototypes' have been regulated through an entirely different parallel legal structure than regular medical vaccines/products? That they want us to believe that these injections are vaccines but in fact they are countermeasures....a confusing word for weapons...in a war? So that the Nuremberg code is only applicable when it concerns medical experimentation and NOT the intentional maiming and killing of the population with 'countermeasures' during a war.
Precisely correct, but while critical to understand, it is only a limited view of the global legal reality-
To be clear, Sasha and Katherine are correct - which is why Sasha is testifying in our cases - BUT lets look from a wider vantage point:
See, the INFERIOR laws in the US disgustingly allow the FDA and their cohort EMA and WHO to do collective research to use pseudo legal twisting of words and get out of research standards, human rights protections and pretend to call them not clinical trials and not adulterated and not investigational... blah, blah - they twist so many words to trick us!
Its totally relevant about how US, UK, WHO, etc call them countermeasures and evade testing, etc, but its only part of the legal story..,
The bizarre limitation of US law twisting law and science is only applicable inside the borders of US, where US laws apply to the US product BEFORE EXPORT - Its a closed loop system
However, upon export the US and Costa Rica (CR) import law law is EXPLICIT:
The applicable and guiding laws change INSTANTLY upon export!
1. People need to get this clear:
When they are exported to developing countries, its exported with labels that must classify it as INVESTIGATIONAL.
side note: Under US laws of export its evil - the same INVESTIGATIONAL product sent out as INVESTIGATIONAL to CR, etc cannot be used in US.... RIDDLE US THAT!
2. People also need to get this key part clear:
Upon export the laws of US DO NOT APPLY. Only laws that ever apply to an exported drug, vaccine, etc are the laws of the country of import - so in our case the Costa Rican laws apply - NOT US laws - at all.
US tricked CR and hundreds of Treasuries the procurement contract was standard.
The CR Health Minister testified WHO and FDA are the source of vax authorizations, and the law therefore says they are responsible under international law.
If its a sham FDA authorization under DoD it will come out in discovery.
Under law of State and international organization responsibility the WHO & USA can be sovereign, but must still be responsible and it is so critical to understand -
Please remember this always:
Under law of responsibility which applies to ALL nations, the State and WHO can never, ever, ever use a national inferior law or internal WHO rule to evade an international obligation under ICCPR and Siracusa Principles to protect the international community as a whole from the crime against humanity of mass serious undue experimentation! Never. We MUST UNDERSTAND AND FIGHT FOR SUPERIOR & INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW WHERE OUR SOVEREIGNTY & PROTECTION LIES.
We are trying to get out from under these cases & get them all filed in order to help teach some civics, public diplomacy and legal strategies on how humanity can beat their inferior BS by rising as masters to a higher plane to crush them on their lower plane and nullify their pseudo law with real superior law that all countries agree on.
We the people of Earth do NOT allow toxic peace or war biological or eugenic experiments on civilians. It is an impermissible delict for states and a crime for people to do - it is abhorrent to civilization as a whole and impermissible! This experimentation is simply NOT Allowed under ICCPR and Siracusa Principles, etc!
No one has proven the truth of experimentation violating the Superior laws yet and no one has proven its a toxic experiment without informed consent yet, which is key to stopping the toxic countermeasures, so keep the faith we can fix this.
PS: DoD and HHS are days away from a default and we can sue them - We asked many key questions to stop them but to answer you - we also asked HHS if we are in a war because they had no "peacetime agreement between HHS and DoD for rollout of the covid vaccine" as required by law prior to the rollout (hmmmmm)
- and there are also two more defaults are coming from them soon we presume, and then we will have it set up to win and force them to stop the countermeasures.
PSS: HHS says they could not find any delegation of authority to send the experiments to CR or any country!!! They wont prevail. Hang tight - trying to clean it up.
Remember, there are always 5 sides to every story, especially when interpreting complex import export and international biomedical research laws - which are being strengthened such as last Dec 2022 in WHO documents - which call it an "unproven intervention outside clinical trials" which require a lot of extra ethics stuff they failed on by the way.... The WHO docs say its impermissible while the looters in the authorization room get rich off violating the ethics guidance as long as they can.
Lets shut it down!
Blessings! - Team IOJ
Thank you so much for this concise explanation! As a Canadian I have often wondered how this would apply for Canada and other countries. Ps. I had to read it twice and let it sink in for a few minutes. Thank you for everything you do. Thank you for helping us remember who we truly are and that nobody can take our rights to live as powerful, free human beings away from us.
Katherine Watt Bailiwick News and Sasha Latypova have extensively described and proven that these injections are countermeasures and do not require approval or clinical trials.
Please see above comment!
Yes, you’re right.
Furthermore, it’s explicitly written that “administration of these countermeasures shall not constitute a clinical trial”.
Please read the above comment we wrote about the difference of laws within US and how it COMPLETELY changes in our favor upon export and we can nail them for sending us some bunk ass INVESTIGATIONAL toxic crap they said was safe, but they knew wasn't! HERE its investigational - there in US its not.
see Pfizer fact sheet US - https://www.cvdvaccine-us.com/ Bottom says: This site is intended only for U.S. healthcare professionals. The products discussed in this site may have different product labeling in different countries.
Here is Pfizer fact sheet GLOBAL https://www.cvdvaccine.com/ - and TA-DA - you will find it is damn well investigational in Costa Rica! How can you tell FOR SURE Dr. Yeadon? You will be shocked! Go to the Global fact sheet and try to find Costa Rica in the drop down menu.
If a country is not in the menu it is NOT approved by the country and Pfizer and FDA find it to be investigational in those countries NOT in the drop down like CR.
Here is from Pfizers Global fact sheet:
"Global Information About Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine (also known as BNT162b2 or as COMIRNATY)
The approval status of the Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine varies worldwide.
For countries where the relevant regulatory authority has not authorised the vaccine or has not authorised it for an age group listed below, the vaccine is investigational and its safety and efficacy have not been established.
Countries that have not authorised the vaccine will not be listed in the respective drop down below.
As information may vary by country, please choose below in which country you are a licensed healthcare professional or recipient/caregiver to access more information on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine."
Remember, the evil Mengele CR Health Minister & vaccination commission secretary both reluctantly testified its imported as investigational and even gave the court the import law art 117 health law - which FDA just so happens to be in violation of!
Then they LIED UNDER OATH IT WASN'T INVESTIGATIONAL to keep it going - which the prosecutor finally agrees is a lie... Sigh,... nightmare!
should it matter whether it was classified as a trial or not? as stated in Article 6 of the UNESCO universal declaration of bioethics and human rights 2005:
"any medical intervention whether preventative, therapeutic, or diagnostic must meet the terms of informed consent. the interested party (patient or legal proxy) can withdraw consent at any time for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice".
That is EXACTLY right! WHO calls covid "vax" an unproven intervention outside a clinical trial (needs extra ethics met) and Costa Rica signed UNESCO universal declaration of bioethics and human rights 2005.
Also see:
The UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights is written into our medical morality law right next to Nuremberg Code...
"The human genome is the complete set of genetic material of the human being. UNESCO regards the human genome as the “heritage of humanity”. UNESCO believes it should be protected and passed on to future generations and that advances in science need to be considered in the light of human rights.
The Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights was adopted unanimously and by acclamation at UNESCO's 29th General Conference on 11 November 1997. The following year, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the Declaration.
It has been cited in many academic and popular journals and has been referred to in numerous national and regional legislation on medicine, privacy and genetic research.. "
Costa Rica signed it - CR Constitution in CR says Art 7 - treaties are higher than constitution.
From the The Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights:
Article 4
The human genome in its natural state shall not give rise to financial gains.
B. Rights of the persons concerned
Article 5
(a) Research, treatment or diagnosis affecting an individual’s genome shall be undertaken only after rigorous and prior assessment of the potential risks and benefits pertaining thereto and in accordance with any other requirement of national law.
(b) In all cases, the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned shall be obtained. If the latter is not in a position to consent, consent or authorization shall be obtained in the manner prescribed by law, guided by the person’s best interest.
(c) The right of each individual to decide whether or not to be informed of the results of genetic examination and the resulting consequences should be respected.
(d) In the case of research, protocols shall, in addition, be submitted for prior review in accordance with relevant national and international research standards or guidelines.
(e) If according to the law a person does not have the capacity to consent, research affecting his or her genome may only be carried out for his or her direct health benefit, subject to the authorization and the protective conditions prescribed by law. Research which does not have an expected direct health benefit may only be undertaken by way of exception, with the utmost restraint, exposing the person only to a minimal risk and minimal burden and if the research is intended to contribute to the health benefit of other persons in the same age category or with the same genetic condition, subject to the conditions prescribed by law, and provided such research is compatible with the protection of the individual’s human rights.
Article 6
No one shall be subjected to discrimination based on genetic characteristics that is intended to infringe or has the effect of infringing human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity.
Article 7
Genetic data associated with an identifiable person and stored or processed for the purposes of research or any other purpose must be held confidential in the conditions set by law.
Article 8
Every individual shall have the right, according to international and national law, to just reparation for any damage sustained as a direct and determining result of an intervention affecting his or her genome.
Article 9
In order to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms, limitations to the principles of consent and confidentiality may only be prescribed by law, for compelling reasons within the bounds of public international law and the international law of human rights.
C. Research on the human genome
Article 10
No research or research applications concerning the human genome, in particular in the fields of biology, genetics and medicine, should prevail over respect for the human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity of individuals or, where applicable, of groups of people.
Article 11
Practices which are contrary to human dignity, such as reproductive cloning of human beings, shall not be permitted. States and competent international organizations are invited to co-operate in identifying such practices and in taking, at national or international level, the measures necessary to ensure that the principles set out in this Declaration are respected.
yes! and how is this not the first and most important thing that people like the anti-v and anti-mandate doctors and proponents are talking about?
it doesn't matter much, at least not in this context. the nature of the intervention is secondary. there is a more basic legal principle at play here, re: basic fundamental human rights as currently recognized under int'l law. key provisions include (but are not limited to):
1. bodily autonomy and informed consent are fundamental human rights to be treated as inviolable.
2. consent cannot be obtained though force, violence, threat, deceit, duress, overreach, or any other form of constraint or coercion.
3. any medical intervention whether preventative, therapeutic, or diagnostic must meet the terms of informed consent
4. the interested party (patient or legal proxy) can withdraw consent at any time for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
5. these rights are to be recognized and upheld even in the events of national or global emergency, such as war, natural disaster, or pandemic.
these provisions are not only included in the Nuremberg codes, but also in:
- the Geneva conventions, the ICCPR 1966/76, the Helsinki declaration 1968 and successive Helsinki accords (most recent 2008), the Rome statutes 2003, and the UNESCO universal declaration of bioethics and human rights 2005.
the problems that were having here are not with the laws. the problem is that the entities normally tasked with prosecuting these crimes are the very ones committing them.
to add: US laws involving informed consent (that I know of. I am not a lawyer) include:
Title 45 part 46, Title 21 parts 312 and 314, Title 16 vol. 2 sect 1028-116, and the Patient's Bill of Rights (state and fed).
NO ! THESE ARE HANGING WORTHY EVILS. --- ALL UNITE
The most evil of evils - ALL UNITE!!!!
They are on their heels. We cannot lighten up one bit now. Now is push time. And we have put them on their heels u try utilizing the rule book they passed out; not ours.
Exactly!!!!! Its PUSH time and they are not prepared to defend their lies over truth once scrutinized by a judge!
BioNTech and Moderna lobby the EU, Swiss and UK regulatory agencies to stop mRNA injections being classified as gene therapy
https://expose-news.com/2024/02/15/biontech-and-moderna-lobby-the-eu/
Thanks!
I have no doubt that almost every aspect of the "Covid Experience was Illegal" in many ways.!
Also, the whole process was Immoral.
None of the so-called Democratic countries had any Mandate for imposing the "Vaccines" or other Draconian measures.
Futhermore, claiming these injections as being "Safe and effective" was an inexcusable fraud which should be prosecuted. Governments nolonger bother to refute the fact of massive "Vaccine related Mortality" (17 Million and counting). This might not meet the definition of Genocide(?). But, it certainly qualifies as "Mass Murder"!
Its all illegal and they just get away with it due to LOCKSTEP corrupt oversight. It's not actually genocide - its the crime against humanity of EXTERMINATION! Extremely similar, but genocide is due to religion, race, etc - this is somewhat indiscriminate. Its got to be proven and stopped as quickly as possible. Its the most insane evil thing in our lives and maybe human history! We are doing our best and it is NOT fast enough! Breaks our hearts - we have close family and parents dead from this!
Democide fits. The murder of any person or people by their government
Exactly!
We appreciate what you are doing! But, this needs more than the efforts of people like you. We need a broad 'Human' declaration of our value as individuals. We are not the "Chattels" of any Government or Self Appointed Authority!
BTW: There has never been a "Statute of Limitation" for Murder!
No statute of limitation on terrorism, genocide or crimes against humanity either! This is AWESOME!! We are actually starting Public Diplomacy and Multilateral diplomacy classes in 4 days - Malta gave us a partial scholarship. We want to use the knowledge and diplomacy certification to help draft a couple REALLY IMPORTANT declarations, manifestos and integrity pacts that we hope to do multilateral negotiations on and get signed by as many nations to help us. We are already certified in Diplomatic Law and Science Diplomacy... We will be announcing a lot of this stuff in a month or so - right now we are focused on the cases and fundraiser to file serious cases! We definitely are NOT their chattel! We are the law - they need to get a clue
- <imhv> - ALL ‘Modern” medications are experiments ! Who else feels they live in “a world wide lab?”
We completely agree - the worlds been a lab for big pharma for quite some time! Its all experimental and most makes you worse off!
To your point, via Julian Gillespie; https://anandamide.substack.com/p/more-lot-surveillance-reveals-dna
Here is what an investigative, Agent131711, has to say on COVID https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/covid-isnt-what-we-think-old-documents?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1865725&post_id=140801796&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1fi07j&utm_medium=email