We agree we all need a debate. Keep in mind you made a lot of scientific presumptions that you want Dr. Yeadon to agree is basic fact, but he is out saying that his own basic presumptions on the matter had to have an overhaul. He no longer believes any virus exists, Having said that, it may not be spread through the air as you and most p…
We agree we all need a debate. Keep in mind you made a lot of scientific presumptions that you want Dr. Yeadon to agree is basic fact, but he is out saying that his own basic presumptions on the matter had to have an overhaul. He no longer believes any virus exists, Having said that, it may not be spread through the air as you and most people presume. It may not be GoF virus spreading - maybe an aerosolised nano robot bioweapon making illnesses for all we know? In law a presumption must be considered true until rebutted! We are waiting for the judicial debate because we are not scientists.
As far as the following questions we are here to help bring this madness to justice and we do agree there must be a GoF moratorium.
Why is nobody interested in bringing those crazy minds to court who are responsible for this man-made disaster (just for clarification: this should not be limited to those frail persons that may have died from COVID19 but must include all the horrific consequences)? (IOJ is suing the WHO, et al - join us! SuetheWHO.org)
+ What tools are at our hand to block the new pandemic treaty by WHO (that uses this „pandemic“ to justify this incredible power grab)? (stay tuned - IOJ is putting together the master plan - its in process)
+ What tools are at our hands to stand up against the changes of the IHR with elimination of human rights, human dignity and freedom as core values? (its in process with legal demands they DEFAULTED on and now we can sue the WHO and all delegates to stop the treaty because its VOID)
+ How can we hold responsible all those on the national and international level (including UN, WHO and EU) who violated basic human rights (and still do so)? (IOJ got them to waive immunity and are about to fundraise the costs and file it against UN, WHO, WEF, FDA, DoD, etc)
+ Where are the structures that facilitates that WE THE PEOPLE quit our membership and / or participation in corrupt international organizations like WHO or EU and which alternatives could safeguard our future (social, economic, peaceful) life? (good question - we need to force our accountability system to work and get out. We truly believe it will need to be a judge discrediting the WHO/UN programs as VOID and harming human rights - then the Member States will be forced to exit the discredited organization that violates human rights!)
+ Where are the people willing and able to set up a second Nuremberg tribunal knowing that we cannot count on national authorities? (Its in process - and national authorities are the only ones with real police power. We NEED them to work!)
Warm regards, There are still solutions - we just need to be very focused and act on them! We the people really need to try directly taking action to the Legislators and courts much more than we are now!!!
The IHR and treaty issues are in violation of jus cogens superior international norms. We will be explaining a lot more on this soon. In our opinion that is the ONLY argument that can stop the new instruments and it must be done in International court! blessings
We agree we all need a debate. Keep in mind you made a lot of scientific presumptions that you want Dr. Yeadon to agree is basic fact, but he is out saying that his own basic presumptions on the matter had to have an overhaul. He no longer believes any virus exists, Having said that, it may not be spread through the air as you and most people presume. It may not be GoF virus spreading - maybe an aerosolised nano robot bioweapon making illnesses for all we know? In law a presumption must be considered true until rebutted! We are waiting for the judicial debate because we are not scientists.
As far as the following questions we are here to help bring this madness to justice and we do agree there must be a GoF moratorium.
Why is nobody interested in bringing those crazy minds to court who are responsible for this man-made disaster (just for clarification: this should not be limited to those frail persons that may have died from COVID19 but must include all the horrific consequences)? (IOJ is suing the WHO, et al - join us! SuetheWHO.org)
+ What tools are at our hand to block the new pandemic treaty by WHO (that uses this „pandemic“ to justify this incredible power grab)? (stay tuned - IOJ is putting together the master plan - its in process)
+ What tools are at our hands to stand up against the changes of the IHR with elimination of human rights, human dignity and freedom as core values? (its in process with legal demands they DEFAULTED on and now we can sue the WHO and all delegates to stop the treaty because its VOID)
+ How can we hold responsible all those on the national and international level (including UN, WHO and EU) who violated basic human rights (and still do so)? (IOJ got them to waive immunity and are about to fundraise the costs and file it against UN, WHO, WEF, FDA, DoD, etc)
+ Where are the structures that facilitates that WE THE PEOPLE quit our membership and / or participation in corrupt international organizations like WHO or EU and which alternatives could safeguard our future (social, economic, peaceful) life? (good question - we need to force our accountability system to work and get out. We truly believe it will need to be a judge discrediting the WHO/UN programs as VOID and harming human rights - then the Member States will be forced to exit the discredited organization that violates human rights!)
+ Where are the people willing and able to set up a second Nuremberg tribunal knowing that we cannot count on national authorities? (Its in process - and national authorities are the only ones with real police power. We NEED them to work!)
Warm regards, There are still solutions - we just need to be very focused and act on them! We the people really need to try directly taking action to the Legislators and courts much more than we are now!!!
The IHR and treaty issues are in violation of jus cogens superior international norms. We will be explaining a lot more on this soon. In our opinion that is the ONLY argument that can stop the new instruments and it must be done in International court! blessings