I’m totally convinced that our case has no flaws. I can make a very convincing argument that the jabs were deliberately & knowingly designed with the express purpose of causing injury, maiming and killing Jab recipients.
There’s a series of causes of variation that aren’t really avoidable, which nevertheless I believe have been exploited.
I’m totally convinced that our case has no flaws. I can make a very convincing argument that the jabs were deliberately & knowingly designed with the express purpose of causing injury, maiming and killing Jab recipients.
There’s a series of causes of variation that aren’t really avoidable, which nevertheless I believe have been exploited.
The malevolence of the adverse effects of these injections was:
1. Observed by me and by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg (possibly others, though no one else to our knowledge said so publicly)
2. Written down by us in an open letter to European Medicines Agency (it may have been wider, I must check) dated 1st Dec 2020, BEFORE any jab had received EUA.
3. Specified further in an open letter by “Doctors4CovidEthics” early in 2021, of which I was then a core member, along with Dr Wodarg, Dr Sucharit Bhakhdi, immunologist & long time professor of medical microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany; Dr Stephen Frost (I understand he was one of (or the) medical doctors for Julian Assange, so a pretty brave person; and others who have stepped up to speak publicly. Iirc, I drafted the first version of the first letter. We had spotted that there were clusters of fatal & non fatal cases of cerebral vein sinus thrombosis occurring in young women, who didn’t usually suffer this, clearly a clotting disorder as we predicted.
4. Several people began to pick up persistent excess deaths everywhere which was heavily jabbed, especially pioneered by Joel Smalley, a U.K. based time series expert, and bookended by Prof Denis Rancourt & Co, Canada.
5. Others later spotted persistent falls in live birth rates almost everywhere, as we were concerned about in our first letter.
My experience of designing molecules & knowledge of mechanistic toxicology means I can “stand in the shoes of” those who designed them. There are at least three absolutely central designed-in aspects that couldn’t possibly be there “by mistake”, as I will describe in crisp, clear language. No judge will have the slightest difficulty in understanding what I’ll tell them. You don’t need to be “the cleverest person in the room” of R&D to appreciate these toxicity liabilities. They’re beyond obvious for anyone of modest experience of the field of practise. You would in fact do the opposite of all the things I’ll choose to exemplify if your objective was safety, which is always THE highest priority in public health interventions, even more than efficacy.
(Note to draft, these deliberate huge safety risks include (a) adopting a novel technology, because that would intensify concerns for adverse effects and accordingly greatly increase the time required to satisfy oneself on long term safety; (b) using a gene based treatment, because of its in built certainty if inducing autoimmune style responses to the foreign protein your cells are commandeered to make, responses calculated to kill ever cell expressing the foreign protein; (c) choosing spike protein as gene encoded antigen in the alleged vaccines, because it was considered highly likely that this very protein could have venom-like toxicity in mammals, including blood clots; (d) ignoring the risk of the phenomenon of immune off target effects, which I predicted could lead to infertility, miscarriage and/or perinatal mortality; (e) choosing lipid nano particles as formulation, when I was well known in the industry that doing so would result in accumulation of this poison in the ovaries of female children and women of child bearing potential.
All of these predicable risks & toxicities have occurred.
There are no good arguments for ignoring these glaring rishs.
I can also explain why developing a new vaccine could never have been viable from the very start. There’s insufficient time to conduct even the most sketchy and recklessly fast development program, before any real pandemic had run its course.
Furthermore, referencing the fraud that is the flu vaccine, I will show that the only arguably vulnerable cohort to the alleged virus, the frail elderly, could not benefit even from a “safe and effective” injection, because their immune systems are somewhat unresponsive to new infections, which is in part why they’re vulnerable in the first place (note, I do not believe there ever was a virus & I will both explain why I’ve reached that conclusion as well as the only rational way to look at the Wuhan origins narrative).
Quite separately, I will show that an injection into a muscle, followed by movement out into the bloodstream, could not possibly have elicited a protective immune response for the airways. It’s all theatre, intended to get billions to roll up their sleeves (again, note I don’t believe the virus narrative but my statements are true if the narrative is true or not).
With medical doctors and as a qualified toxicologist, I explain why we NEVER expose pregnant women to experimental medical interventions. The brightest of red lines was breached and continues to be breached.
Further, based on official data, children are not at risk from this alleged pandemic virus, so injecting as many children as possible is an evil act with no redeeming features. Those who argued “it’ll save granny” need a refresher on medical ethics and on the lack of evidence, then & now, for suppression of transmission. The burden of proof is absolutely on them & it’s not there.
You’d also never jab those who’d had the alleged disease and recovered. Doing so would raise risks of adverse effects & would be completely unnecessary & reckless.
There’s more, but for goodness sake, the jabs do not do anything positive. Nothing at all.
Do please remember that the evidence is strong that there never even was a pandemic.
Please keep this safe in the event I’m not able to testify & ask Sucharit Bhakdhi & Sasha Latypova to be lead witnesses along with Dr Janci Tox.
Thank you so much for taking the time to explain these essential details Dr. Yeadon. We got all these notes and will add them to the expanded appeal.
You are so right the burden of proof is on them and they cant back up their BS claims.
Don't worry, you will be able to testify by virtual and it will be easy and safe. Your testimony in particular is critical, especially since you are the one who refuted our health minister before 2 x on record. Everything we are doing now rests on our previous record we built and how they all failed to refute us!
As we said when we met, CR has a thing for brands - all we have to do is waive your credentials with Pfizer and challenge them with logic, reason and science and we got this in the bag. They look up to brands here for some reason so we know that your Pfizer background will be hugely persuasive.
Even in SPARS doc they say it will be unravelled and truth will be shown. They knew humanity will resolve this in a few years. Its ok. We are all protected by doing Gods work. Keep the faith and stay strong Dr. Yeadon. We would NOT go up against the 7 headed Beast of Babylon if we thought we could lose or end up more vulnerable. Its conquer or die. We can and will beat them and PREVAIL VICTORIOUS as a service to humanity!!
You are essential to this mission and we have your back!
I’m totally convinced that our case has no flaws. I can make a very convincing argument that the jabs were deliberately & knowingly designed with the express purpose of causing injury, maiming and killing Jab recipients.
There’s a series of causes of variation that aren’t really avoidable, which nevertheless I believe have been exploited.
The malevolence of the adverse effects of these injections was:
1. Observed by me and by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg (possibly others, though no one else to our knowledge said so publicly)
2. Written down by us in an open letter to European Medicines Agency (it may have been wider, I must check) dated 1st Dec 2020, BEFORE any jab had received EUA.
3. Specified further in an open letter by “Doctors4CovidEthics” early in 2021, of which I was then a core member, along with Dr Wodarg, Dr Sucharit Bhakhdi, immunologist & long time professor of medical microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany; Dr Stephen Frost (I understand he was one of (or the) medical doctors for Julian Assange, so a pretty brave person; and others who have stepped up to speak publicly. Iirc, I drafted the first version of the first letter. We had spotted that there were clusters of fatal & non fatal cases of cerebral vein sinus thrombosis occurring in young women, who didn’t usually suffer this, clearly a clotting disorder as we predicted.
4. Several people began to pick up persistent excess deaths everywhere which was heavily jabbed, especially pioneered by Joel Smalley, a U.K. based time series expert, and bookended by Prof Denis Rancourt & Co, Canada.
5. Others later spotted persistent falls in live birth rates almost everywhere, as we were concerned about in our first letter.
My experience of designing molecules & knowledge of mechanistic toxicology means I can “stand in the shoes of” those who designed them. There are at least three absolutely central designed-in aspects that couldn’t possibly be there “by mistake”, as I will describe in crisp, clear language. No judge will have the slightest difficulty in understanding what I’ll tell them. You don’t need to be “the cleverest person in the room” of R&D to appreciate these toxicity liabilities. They’re beyond obvious for anyone of modest experience of the field of practise. You would in fact do the opposite of all the things I’ll choose to exemplify if your objective was safety, which is always THE highest priority in public health interventions, even more than efficacy.
(Note to draft, these deliberate huge safety risks include (a) adopting a novel technology, because that would intensify concerns for adverse effects and accordingly greatly increase the time required to satisfy oneself on long term safety; (b) using a gene based treatment, because of its in built certainty if inducing autoimmune style responses to the foreign protein your cells are commandeered to make, responses calculated to kill ever cell expressing the foreign protein; (c) choosing spike protein as gene encoded antigen in the alleged vaccines, because it was considered highly likely that this very protein could have venom-like toxicity in mammals, including blood clots; (d) ignoring the risk of the phenomenon of immune off target effects, which I predicted could lead to infertility, miscarriage and/or perinatal mortality; (e) choosing lipid nano particles as formulation, when I was well known in the industry that doing so would result in accumulation of this poison in the ovaries of female children and women of child bearing potential.
All of these predicable risks & toxicities have occurred.
There are no good arguments for ignoring these glaring rishs.
I can also explain why developing a new vaccine could never have been viable from the very start. There’s insufficient time to conduct even the most sketchy and recklessly fast development program, before any real pandemic had run its course.
Furthermore, referencing the fraud that is the flu vaccine, I will show that the only arguably vulnerable cohort to the alleged virus, the frail elderly, could not benefit even from a “safe and effective” injection, because their immune systems are somewhat unresponsive to new infections, which is in part why they’re vulnerable in the first place (note, I do not believe there ever was a virus & I will both explain why I’ve reached that conclusion as well as the only rational way to look at the Wuhan origins narrative).
Quite separately, I will show that an injection into a muscle, followed by movement out into the bloodstream, could not possibly have elicited a protective immune response for the airways. It’s all theatre, intended to get billions to roll up their sleeves (again, note I don’t believe the virus narrative but my statements are true if the narrative is true or not).
With medical doctors and as a qualified toxicologist, I explain why we NEVER expose pregnant women to experimental medical interventions. The brightest of red lines was breached and continues to be breached.
Further, based on official data, children are not at risk from this alleged pandemic virus, so injecting as many children as possible is an evil act with no redeeming features. Those who argued “it’ll save granny” need a refresher on medical ethics and on the lack of evidence, then & now, for suppression of transmission. The burden of proof is absolutely on them & it’s not there.
You’d also never jab those who’d had the alleged disease and recovered. Doing so would raise risks of adverse effects & would be completely unnecessary & reckless.
There’s more, but for goodness sake, the jabs do not do anything positive. Nothing at all.
Do please remember that the evidence is strong that there never even was a pandemic.
Please keep this safe in the event I’m not able to testify & ask Sucharit Bhakdhi & Sasha Latypova to be lead witnesses along with Dr Janci Tox.
Best wishes and thanks
Mike
Thank you so much for taking the time to explain these essential details Dr. Yeadon. We got all these notes and will add them to the expanded appeal.
You are so right the burden of proof is on them and they cant back up their BS claims.
Don't worry, you will be able to testify by virtual and it will be easy and safe. Your testimony in particular is critical, especially since you are the one who refuted our health minister before 2 x on record. Everything we are doing now rests on our previous record we built and how they all failed to refute us!
As we said when we met, CR has a thing for brands - all we have to do is waive your credentials with Pfizer and challenge them with logic, reason and science and we got this in the bag. They look up to brands here for some reason so we know that your Pfizer background will be hugely persuasive.
Even in SPARS doc they say it will be unravelled and truth will be shown. They knew humanity will resolve this in a few years. Its ok. We are all protected by doing Gods work. Keep the faith and stay strong Dr. Yeadon. We would NOT go up against the 7 headed Beast of Babylon if we thought we could lose or end up more vulnerable. Its conquer or die. We can and will beat them and PREVAIL VICTORIOUS as a service to humanity!!
You are essential to this mission and we have your back!
IOJ family
God bless you, Dr. Mike. You are one of the great heroes in the medical freedom movement.
I second that! one of the very first to take a stand without fanfare7
Thank you Dr Yeadon for your moral courage.