It was pure luck that, as a result of my own inexperience with US visas, I found myself & my incredible wife and lifelong partner trapped in Costa Rica a couple of years ago. If I’d known then etc I would have stayed in England to complete the visa process, which ultimately we had to do, returning to London after a few months. Put it down to (in)experience.
But the luck was, I learned of IOJ’s existence there through a mutual friend and so we were able to meet F2F, out of which grew that affidavit and it’s amended follow up. It’ll probably need amending again, we’ll see.
However I pointed out to IOJ that there’s a world of difference between having a sound opinion on a thing and being able to testify about it.
I do think I’m adequately qualified to scene set. I’m a professional research scientist and dot joiner. I’m also highly experienced in “rational drug design” and “mechanistic toxicology”.
But while I have some good knowledge of clinical development and regulatory requirements, the other side will easily make me look like a hopelessly unqualified giver of testimony. It’s not my bullseye of daily responsibility.
So rest assured, we will have other experts, people you’ve heard of.
Not going to name them, that’ll be for the lawyers & only once it’s been decided exactly what we’re going to claim and prove.
Exciting times.
Obviously we retain concern for judicial independence but we can do no more than play it straight and see what happens.
When you came to Costa Rica we actually called you to us from the divine ether. No shit we told the divine we needed Dr. Yeadon and no one else will do. You were there within weeks. This is divinely guided! You are going to blow them all away Dr. Yeadon! They are not qualified to go toe to toe with you. We have truth & ethics & real science on our side and it will prevail! Thank you also so incredibly much for going above and beyond to help arrange much behind the scenes with witnesses! Truly, truly exiting! We are turning the tide slowly but surely joining the dots to expose them. We have faith in the judge because we will sue if they get it wrong! CR Appeals court usually gets it right. We can do no more than play it straight and see what happens. IOJ thanks you again for standing up to the pure evil and helping to expose it with us in a real venue with a judge that can help us all stop the trainwreck! Its totally going to work! We know it will win!
I’m totally convinced that our case has no flaws. I can make a very convincing argument that the jabs were deliberately & knowingly designed with the express purpose of causing injury, maiming and killing Jab recipients.
There’s a series of causes of variation that aren’t really avoidable, which nevertheless I believe have been exploited.
The malevolence of the adverse effects of these injections was:
1. Observed by me and by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg (possibly others, though no one else to our knowledge said so publicly)
2. Written down by us in an open letter to European Medicines Agency (it may have been wider, I must check) dated 1st Dec 2020, BEFORE any jab had received EUA.
3. Specified further in an open letter by “Doctors4CovidEthics” early in 2021, of which I was then a core member, along with Dr Wodarg, Dr Sucharit Bhakhdi, immunologist & long time professor of medical microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany; Dr Stephen Frost (I understand he was one of (or the) medical doctors for Julian Assange, so a pretty brave person; and others who have stepped up to speak publicly. Iirc, I drafted the first version of the first letter. We had spotted that there were clusters of fatal & non fatal cases of cerebral vein sinus thrombosis occurring in young women, who didn’t usually suffer this, clearly a clotting disorder as we predicted.
4. Several people began to pick up persistent excess deaths everywhere which was heavily jabbed, especially pioneered by Joel Smalley, a U.K. based time series expert, and bookended by Prof Denis Rancourt & Co, Canada.
5. Others later spotted persistent falls in live birth rates almost everywhere, as we were concerned about in our first letter.
My experience of designing molecules & knowledge of mechanistic toxicology means I can “stand in the shoes of” those who designed them. There are at least three absolutely central designed-in aspects that couldn’t possibly be there “by mistake”, as I will describe in crisp, clear language. No judge will have the slightest difficulty in understanding what I’ll tell them. You don’t need to be “the cleverest person in the room” of R&D to appreciate these toxicity liabilities. They’re beyond obvious for anyone of modest experience of the field of practise. You would in fact do the opposite of all the things I’ll choose to exemplify if your objective was safety, which is always THE highest priority in public health interventions, even more than efficacy.
(Note to draft, these deliberate huge safety risks include (a) adopting a novel technology, because that would intensify concerns for adverse effects and accordingly greatly increase the time required to satisfy oneself on long term safety; (b) using a gene based treatment, because of its in built certainty if inducing autoimmune style responses to the foreign protein your cells are commandeered to make, responses calculated to kill ever cell expressing the foreign protein; (c) choosing spike protein as gene encoded antigen in the alleged vaccines, because it was considered highly likely that this very protein could have venom-like toxicity in mammals, including blood clots; (d) ignoring the risk of the phenomenon of immune off target effects, which I predicted could lead to infertility, miscarriage and/or perinatal mortality; (e) choosing lipid nano particles as formulation, when I was well known in the industry that doing so would result in accumulation of this poison in the ovaries of female children and women of child bearing potential.
All of these predicable risks & toxicities have occurred.
There are no good arguments for ignoring these glaring rishs.
I can also explain why developing a new vaccine could never have been viable from the very start. There’s insufficient time to conduct even the most sketchy and recklessly fast development program, before any real pandemic had run its course.
Furthermore, referencing the fraud that is the flu vaccine, I will show that the only arguably vulnerable cohort to the alleged virus, the frail elderly, could not benefit even from a “safe and effective” injection, because their immune systems are somewhat unresponsive to new infections, which is in part why they’re vulnerable in the first place (note, I do not believe there ever was a virus & I will both explain why I’ve reached that conclusion as well as the only rational way to look at the Wuhan origins narrative).
Quite separately, I will show that an injection into a muscle, followed by movement out into the bloodstream, could not possibly have elicited a protective immune response for the airways. It’s all theatre, intended to get billions to roll up their sleeves (again, note I don’t believe the virus narrative but my statements are true if the narrative is true or not).
With medical doctors and as a qualified toxicologist, I explain why we NEVER expose pregnant women to experimental medical interventions. The brightest of red lines was breached and continues to be breached.
Further, based on official data, children are not at risk from this alleged pandemic virus, so injecting as many children as possible is an evil act with no redeeming features. Those who argued “it’ll save granny” need a refresher on medical ethics and on the lack of evidence, then & now, for suppression of transmission. The burden of proof is absolutely on them & it’s not there.
You’d also never jab those who’d had the alleged disease and recovered. Doing so would raise risks of adverse effects & would be completely unnecessary & reckless.
There’s more, but for goodness sake, the jabs do not do anything positive. Nothing at all.
Do please remember that the evidence is strong that there never even was a pandemic.
Please keep this safe in the event I’m not able to testify & ask Sucharit Bhakdhi & Sasha Latypova to be lead witnesses along with Dr Janci Tox.
Thank you so much for taking the time to explain these essential details Dr. Yeadon. We got all these notes and will add them to the expanded appeal.
You are so right the burden of proof is on them and they cant back up their BS claims.
Don't worry, you will be able to testify by virtual and it will be easy and safe. Your testimony in particular is critical, especially since you are the one who refuted our health minister before 2 x on record. Everything we are doing now rests on our previous record we built and how they all failed to refute us!
As we said when we met, CR has a thing for brands - all we have to do is waive your credentials with Pfizer and challenge them with logic, reason and science and we got this in the bag. They look up to brands here for some reason so we know that your Pfizer background will be hugely persuasive.
Even in SPARS doc they say it will be unravelled and truth will be shown. They knew humanity will resolve this in a few years. Its ok. We are all protected by doing Gods work. Keep the faith and stay strong Dr. Yeadon. We would NOT go up against the 7 headed Beast of Babylon if we thought we could lose or end up more vulnerable. Its conquer or die. We can and will beat them and PREVAIL VICTORIOUS as a service to humanity!!
You are essential to this mission and we have your back!
Thank you Dr. Yeadon for everything you are doing to help expose and punish the pure evil we have been witnessing for years! Your family should be so proud of you! We all are :-)
I think you should ask Tom for his information as you go into court. And his help. I believe he will give it.
The US "justice" system works a certain way. It may be that how you did things could work in the US. I don't know that for certain. It may be that in the US what you are doing is not possible or not possible to the degree you have accomplished in Costa Rica.
What I do know is that your work has been difficult and impressive and there are many of us behind you. I would ask for the help and see what happens.
Agreed! We are actually drafting a letter to him as we speak! We wrote him before but he always says he is so busy he has a hard time answering emails. We will try a couple more times.
He's not needed for the precautionary measure hearing Nov 9, but he could help us expand topics and come into our main case right after we win the precautionary measure to stop the shots.
We are willing to file anything important against any tyrant on earth and if he has dirt he should bring it to IOJ's attention pronto to include it in our filings and testify at our trial that is going to happen soon.
We will take the advice, ask for help, offer our help - at his service - and see what happens.
We expect greatness out of the freedom fighters. We accept nothing less - if you put yourself out there and gathered intel for court - use it! In any court. Tom Renz must use the dirt he worked hard to get and he can come into our main case to share it. He does shows and audiences can understand the evidence and issues, therefore so can a judge.
PS: Our court has ability to gain jurisdiction over USA entities and all entities involved directly or indirectly in the experiments.
CR court is a way better venue than rigged corrupt USA courts - part of the reason we are suing here - we want to actually win and its hopeless there and most places right now.
Pray! This is NOT a case for just CR - it affects global, the venue is just held in CR.
I wonder also in addition to advice & potentially evidence, Tom may have a group of superb experts who may be just right to help nail the crooks with testimony. I respect Tom & know his heart is strong, yet the legal process in USA is it’s unique self, may well be different elsewhere and who knows it may even be designed in such a way as to make demonstrating crookedness harder than it needs to be.
Yes fighting in USA kangaroo courts is like pushing water upstream... We think whistleblower Andrew Huffs key facts and evidence would be a humdinger in the main case after the injunction hearing Nov 9 - We wrote Renz tonight to ask for help with any key facts or witnesses that absolutely must be included if he thinks of any, in particular to introduce us to Huff! We would gratefully accept any advice and/or key evidence from Tom Renz! It takes a village to stop a global takeover with a biological agent.
I put word on his substack: "Dear Tom, Interest of Justice is asking for your help. They have had difficulty reaching you. They are wondering what you have learned about breaking the immunity shield and hoping you will help with there case with information you have.
Their case is coming up soon. I ask that you help them as best you can because they are the furthest along in holding these criminals to account. If US or other international attorneys, can bring knowledge and aid to their case I say, let's do it! What may not be possible in the US due to our situation with our courts is happening in Costa Rica."
You totally rock Jill! Thank you for taking action and helping. We really appreciate you reaching out to Tom and us to try to facilitate more help on this critical case! Its a community effort! We cant afford not to do it! All hands on deck!
Until freedom and beyond!!! Infinite blessings, IOJ
Have you considered these lawsuits against the DOD since they were actually administering and ordering the shots? Sasha Latypova has the source evidence about this.
The George Watts lawsuit is supposed to be the first of this kind.
Yes - Thanks! The Watts case is in our Appeal as new evidence. It goes with our FOIA info requests to HHS & DoD for the "reports from HHS to DoD on the experimental biological agent called covid-19 vaccine".
But there are others, aren't there? What about Aaron Siri and ICAN? And RFK and Mary Holland of CHD? And the brave doctors and lawyers bringing cases in South Africa?
You are absolutely right. The ones you mentioned are our hero's kicking butt - but they are such a very small group of attorneys - Todd Callender and there must be others like the Indian BAR that sued the WHO Chief Scientist for demonizing ivermectin & the one in Nederlands recently that sued Bill Gates and the cabal for damages, but it seems we can name the ones we know of on two hands! It really does tell a lot about every other lawyer in this country. Not a good thing. Renz isn't the only one at all, but there is a clear need for WAY more attorneys to stand up to do the right thing and bring solid cases.
Exactly. Where is their love if the attorneys Renz knows cant work for less than $200k a year during a WAR on humanity? It is quite doable to live on less! Us peasants could use some legal assistants over here haha but cant afford to hire the illustrious services of BAR legal "defenders"... Which lawyers does Tom Renz know? Can they come down to Earth and lower their fees for helping to intervene in a WAR on humanity?
Its not authenticated testimony so each witness he had would need to come in again under oath - but we can also bring Fullmich in to have him testify about his conclusions to so many interviews! Its on the table to figure out what we need from him. Thanks for bringing that up and looking out - he has a ton of info to draw from!
Sooner the better, as I am sure Dr Fuellmich would have other - not publicly aired - information and details that need investigating/collating beforehand.
Also his experiences successfully suing Deutsche Bank (& as an employee with Deutsche Bank), especially given the "involvement" of said Bank - J Epstein was a favourite customer and ------
Just an idea: could ALL the attorneys fighting globally not be brought into some sort of loose coalition the purpose being to bolster each other's cases? Perhaps by filing amicus briefs wherever possible. Although almost no one I talk to believes it, this IS now or never for humanity. One of my learned legal friends, when I last spoke to him last year, said not to worry, there was no cabal at work, and if anyone so much as laid a pinkie on our South African Constitution he would personally leap up and crush them in court. My god, this rocks my confidence in the legal profession. I always imagined they were the ones on whom no one could pull a fast one. Yet across the world our rights have been trampled before their eyes. And as you say IOJ where the hell are they?
When RFK jnr gets into the WH he could start a state funded foundation akin to the WEFs Young Leaders program but to prepare politicians, scientists, lawyers etc for careers serving humanity rather than mamon. And to develop critical thinking in young people. Teachers at this institution would be mentors who guide people's development rather than telling them what to think. They would be people like IOJ and Mike Yeadon who have a proven track record of courage and integrity. All children start off inherently idealistic and then somewhere along the way the system sucks it out of them.
But first things first : let's give what we can to support IOJ to win this case!
You are not ranting, you are amazing with what you have and are achieving.
Your missive here is totally justified!! The comparisons between yourselves and the American legal approach is self evident.
Many years ago I wrote to an American group, saying "Americans worship daily at the Altar of the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR". This is not sarcasm but a statement to hopefully wake this sadly money obsessed Country up.
America is so much the root of the evil that has and is permeating into all levels of and areas in OUR World. They have so so much to answer for and desperately need to attend to their own housekeeping and disasters they have and are perpetrating onto humanity.
Money and war is seen as the solution by the USA. Their ways are NOT right, and the World is fed up with them being forced on it- that has been true for a long, long time.
IOJ , I am sure many people in the World who have tried but never had true Justice, despite paying dearly for legal "help" because of the Legal world being so obsessed and arrogant about their little World and charging ridiculous amounts , while protecting an inadequate system that has and is long overdue to very close examination and restructure, also Practitioners in the legal worl can be ignorant and too lazy to KNOW the Law, and the client pays for that ignorance too.
I always remember an Australian legal employed by a "leading" Sydney law firm, Henry Davis York, who, when I pointed out a glaring basic error in my purchase of a piece of land, said "all care given NO responsibility taken, we can take that case to Court for you" to me a cheap, cheap person who was a low class opportunist in short a criminal. He was a friend who lived in the same Sydney suburb.
I learnt my lesson early and have done my own legal work since that time. The few times I was forced to consult a legal person they were bona fide legals.
But Interest of Justice are TRUE LAWYERS and I urge people to contribute to IOJ in this battle for humanity. Their personal qualities are exemplary and shine through in their work.
There will be other experts testifying.
It was pure luck that, as a result of my own inexperience with US visas, I found myself & my incredible wife and lifelong partner trapped in Costa Rica a couple of years ago. If I’d known then etc I would have stayed in England to complete the visa process, which ultimately we had to do, returning to London after a few months. Put it down to (in)experience.
But the luck was, I learned of IOJ’s existence there through a mutual friend and so we were able to meet F2F, out of which grew that affidavit and it’s amended follow up. It’ll probably need amending again, we’ll see.
However I pointed out to IOJ that there’s a world of difference between having a sound opinion on a thing and being able to testify about it.
I do think I’m adequately qualified to scene set. I’m a professional research scientist and dot joiner. I’m also highly experienced in “rational drug design” and “mechanistic toxicology”.
But while I have some good knowledge of clinical development and regulatory requirements, the other side will easily make me look like a hopelessly unqualified giver of testimony. It’s not my bullseye of daily responsibility.
So rest assured, we will have other experts, people you’ve heard of.
Not going to name them, that’ll be for the lawyers & only once it’s been decided exactly what we’re going to claim and prove.
Exciting times.
Obviously we retain concern for judicial independence but we can do no more than play it straight and see what happens.
Best wishes
Mike
When you came to Costa Rica we actually called you to us from the divine ether. No shit we told the divine we needed Dr. Yeadon and no one else will do. You were there within weeks. This is divinely guided! You are going to blow them all away Dr. Yeadon! They are not qualified to go toe to toe with you. We have truth & ethics & real science on our side and it will prevail! Thank you also so incredibly much for going above and beyond to help arrange much behind the scenes with witnesses! Truly, truly exiting! We are turning the tide slowly but surely joining the dots to expose them. We have faith in the judge because we will sue if they get it wrong! CR Appeals court usually gets it right. We can do no more than play it straight and see what happens. IOJ thanks you again for standing up to the pure evil and helping to expose it with us in a real venue with a judge that can help us all stop the trainwreck! Its totally going to work! We know it will win!
I’m totally convinced that our case has no flaws. I can make a very convincing argument that the jabs were deliberately & knowingly designed with the express purpose of causing injury, maiming and killing Jab recipients.
There’s a series of causes of variation that aren’t really avoidable, which nevertheless I believe have been exploited.
The malevolence of the adverse effects of these injections was:
1. Observed by me and by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg (possibly others, though no one else to our knowledge said so publicly)
2. Written down by us in an open letter to European Medicines Agency (it may have been wider, I must check) dated 1st Dec 2020, BEFORE any jab had received EUA.
3. Specified further in an open letter by “Doctors4CovidEthics” early in 2021, of which I was then a core member, along with Dr Wodarg, Dr Sucharit Bhakhdi, immunologist & long time professor of medical microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany; Dr Stephen Frost (I understand he was one of (or the) medical doctors for Julian Assange, so a pretty brave person; and others who have stepped up to speak publicly. Iirc, I drafted the first version of the first letter. We had spotted that there were clusters of fatal & non fatal cases of cerebral vein sinus thrombosis occurring in young women, who didn’t usually suffer this, clearly a clotting disorder as we predicted.
4. Several people began to pick up persistent excess deaths everywhere which was heavily jabbed, especially pioneered by Joel Smalley, a U.K. based time series expert, and bookended by Prof Denis Rancourt & Co, Canada.
5. Others later spotted persistent falls in live birth rates almost everywhere, as we were concerned about in our first letter.
My experience of designing molecules & knowledge of mechanistic toxicology means I can “stand in the shoes of” those who designed them. There are at least three absolutely central designed-in aspects that couldn’t possibly be there “by mistake”, as I will describe in crisp, clear language. No judge will have the slightest difficulty in understanding what I’ll tell them. You don’t need to be “the cleverest person in the room” of R&D to appreciate these toxicity liabilities. They’re beyond obvious for anyone of modest experience of the field of practise. You would in fact do the opposite of all the things I’ll choose to exemplify if your objective was safety, which is always THE highest priority in public health interventions, even more than efficacy.
(Note to draft, these deliberate huge safety risks include (a) adopting a novel technology, because that would intensify concerns for adverse effects and accordingly greatly increase the time required to satisfy oneself on long term safety; (b) using a gene based treatment, because of its in built certainty if inducing autoimmune style responses to the foreign protein your cells are commandeered to make, responses calculated to kill ever cell expressing the foreign protein; (c) choosing spike protein as gene encoded antigen in the alleged vaccines, because it was considered highly likely that this very protein could have venom-like toxicity in mammals, including blood clots; (d) ignoring the risk of the phenomenon of immune off target effects, which I predicted could lead to infertility, miscarriage and/or perinatal mortality; (e) choosing lipid nano particles as formulation, when I was well known in the industry that doing so would result in accumulation of this poison in the ovaries of female children and women of child bearing potential.
All of these predicable risks & toxicities have occurred.
There are no good arguments for ignoring these glaring rishs.
I can also explain why developing a new vaccine could never have been viable from the very start. There’s insufficient time to conduct even the most sketchy and recklessly fast development program, before any real pandemic had run its course.
Furthermore, referencing the fraud that is the flu vaccine, I will show that the only arguably vulnerable cohort to the alleged virus, the frail elderly, could not benefit even from a “safe and effective” injection, because their immune systems are somewhat unresponsive to new infections, which is in part why they’re vulnerable in the first place (note, I do not believe there ever was a virus & I will both explain why I’ve reached that conclusion as well as the only rational way to look at the Wuhan origins narrative).
Quite separately, I will show that an injection into a muscle, followed by movement out into the bloodstream, could not possibly have elicited a protective immune response for the airways. It’s all theatre, intended to get billions to roll up their sleeves (again, note I don’t believe the virus narrative but my statements are true if the narrative is true or not).
With medical doctors and as a qualified toxicologist, I explain why we NEVER expose pregnant women to experimental medical interventions. The brightest of red lines was breached and continues to be breached.
Further, based on official data, children are not at risk from this alleged pandemic virus, so injecting as many children as possible is an evil act with no redeeming features. Those who argued “it’ll save granny” need a refresher on medical ethics and on the lack of evidence, then & now, for suppression of transmission. The burden of proof is absolutely on them & it’s not there.
You’d also never jab those who’d had the alleged disease and recovered. Doing so would raise risks of adverse effects & would be completely unnecessary & reckless.
There’s more, but for goodness sake, the jabs do not do anything positive. Nothing at all.
Do please remember that the evidence is strong that there never even was a pandemic.
Please keep this safe in the event I’m not able to testify & ask Sucharit Bhakdhi & Sasha Latypova to be lead witnesses along with Dr Janci Tox.
Best wishes and thanks
Mike
Thank you so much for taking the time to explain these essential details Dr. Yeadon. We got all these notes and will add them to the expanded appeal.
You are so right the burden of proof is on them and they cant back up their BS claims.
Don't worry, you will be able to testify by virtual and it will be easy and safe. Your testimony in particular is critical, especially since you are the one who refuted our health minister before 2 x on record. Everything we are doing now rests on our previous record we built and how they all failed to refute us!
As we said when we met, CR has a thing for brands - all we have to do is waive your credentials with Pfizer and challenge them with logic, reason and science and we got this in the bag. They look up to brands here for some reason so we know that your Pfizer background will be hugely persuasive.
Even in SPARS doc they say it will be unravelled and truth will be shown. They knew humanity will resolve this in a few years. Its ok. We are all protected by doing Gods work. Keep the faith and stay strong Dr. Yeadon. We would NOT go up against the 7 headed Beast of Babylon if we thought we could lose or end up more vulnerable. Its conquer or die. We can and will beat them and PREVAIL VICTORIOUS as a service to humanity!!
You are essential to this mission and we have your back!
IOJ family
God bless you, Dr. Mike. You are one of the great heroes in the medical freedom movement.
I second that! one of the very first to take a stand without fanfare7
Thank you Dr Yeadon for your moral courage.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon for everything you are doing to help expose and punish the pure evil we have been witnessing for years! Your family should be so proud of you! We all are :-)
Yes! We are proud too. A lot of people are proud of courageous and honorable whistleblower Dr. Yeadon!
I think you should ask Tom for his information as you go into court. And his help. I believe he will give it.
The US "justice" system works a certain way. It may be that how you did things could work in the US. I don't know that for certain. It may be that in the US what you are doing is not possible or not possible to the degree you have accomplished in Costa Rica.
What I do know is that your work has been difficult and impressive and there are many of us behind you. I would ask for the help and see what happens.
Agreed! We are actually drafting a letter to him as we speak! We wrote him before but he always says he is so busy he has a hard time answering emails. We will try a couple more times.
He's not needed for the precautionary measure hearing Nov 9, but he could help us expand topics and come into our main case right after we win the precautionary measure to stop the shots.
We are willing to file anything important against any tyrant on earth and if he has dirt he should bring it to IOJ's attention pronto to include it in our filings and testify at our trial that is going to happen soon.
We will take the advice, ask for help, offer our help - at his service - and see what happens.
We expect greatness out of the freedom fighters. We accept nothing less - if you put yourself out there and gathered intel for court - use it! In any court. Tom Renz must use the dirt he worked hard to get and he can come into our main case to share it. He does shows and audiences can understand the evidence and issues, therefore so can a judge.
PS: Our court has ability to gain jurisdiction over USA entities and all entities involved directly or indirectly in the experiments.
CR court is a way better venue than rigged corrupt USA courts - part of the reason we are suing here - we want to actually win and its hopeless there and most places right now.
Pray! This is NOT a case for just CR - it affects global, the venue is just held in CR.
I wonder also in addition to advice & potentially evidence, Tom may have a group of superb experts who may be just right to help nail the crooks with testimony. I respect Tom & know his heart is strong, yet the legal process in USA is it’s unique self, may well be different elsewhere and who knows it may even be designed in such a way as to make demonstrating crookedness harder than it needs to be.
Yes fighting in USA kangaroo courts is like pushing water upstream... We think whistleblower Andrew Huffs key facts and evidence would be a humdinger in the main case after the injunction hearing Nov 9 - We wrote Renz tonight to ask for help with any key facts or witnesses that absolutely must be included if he thinks of any, in particular to introduce us to Huff! We would gratefully accept any advice and/or key evidence from Tom Renz! It takes a village to stop a global takeover with a biological agent.
I put word on his substack: "Dear Tom, Interest of Justice is asking for your help. They have had difficulty reaching you. They are wondering what you have learned about breaking the immunity shield and hoping you will help with there case with information you have.
Their case is coming up soon. I ask that you help them as best you can because they are the furthest along in holding these criminals to account. If US or other international attorneys, can bring knowledge and aid to their case I say, let's do it! What may not be possible in the US due to our situation with our courts is happening in Costa Rica."
Keep fighting and blessings. Jill
You totally rock Jill! Thank you for taking action and helping. We really appreciate you reaching out to Tom and us to try to facilitate more help on this critical case! Its a community effort! We cant afford not to do it! All hands on deck!
Until freedom and beyond!!! Infinite blessings, IOJ
Thank you for the blessings. Blessing upon this earth and all who are given life because of it!
Have you considered these lawsuits against the DOD since they were actually administering and ordering the shots? Sasha Latypova has the source evidence about this.
The George Watts lawsuit is supposed to be the first of this kind.
https://www.mytwintiers.com/news-cat/covid-19-vaccine-killed-our-son-says-lawsuit-against-dept-of-defense/
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/family-of-24-year-old-who-died-from
Here is a class action lawsuit in Australia too.
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/class-action-commenced-over-covid-19-vaccine-injuries/
Yes - Thanks! The Watts case is in our Appeal as new evidence. It goes with our FOIA info requests to HHS & DoD for the "reports from HHS to DoD on the experimental biological agent called covid-19 vaccine".
see: https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/hhs-says-our-foia-request-is-unusual.
The HHS has so many reports on the "experimental biological agent called covid-19 vaccine" that they asked for more time and now are stonewalling.
We are about to sue HHS to get the DoD reports and DoD's role was mentioned in the appeal which has the hearing set for Nov 9!
If Renz is the ONLY lawyer willing to stand up to these criminals it really tells about every other lawyer in this country. Not a good thing.
Excellent point!
But there are others, aren't there? What about Aaron Siri and ICAN? And RFK and Mary Holland of CHD? And the brave doctors and lawyers bringing cases in South Africa?
You are absolutely right. The ones you mentioned are our hero's kicking butt - but they are such a very small group of attorneys - Todd Callender and there must be others like the Indian BAR that sued the WHO Chief Scientist for demonizing ivermectin & the one in Nederlands recently that sued Bill Gates and the cabal for damages, but it seems we can name the ones we know of on two hands! It really does tell a lot about every other lawyer in this country. Not a good thing. Renz isn't the only one at all, but there is a clear need for WAY more attorneys to stand up to do the right thing and bring solid cases.
I agree, very few lawyers want to do the right thing
I have lived on under 30 g for the past 25 years....its quite do-able...
Exactly. Where is their love if the attorneys Renz knows cant work for less than $200k a year during a WAR on humanity? It is quite doable to live on less! Us peasants could use some legal assistants over here haha but cant afford to hire the illustrious services of BAR legal "defenders"... Which lawyers does Tom Renz know? Can they come down to Earth and lower their fees for helping to intervene in a WAR on humanity?
QUESTION: surely Dr Reiner Fuellmichs Evidence would be of use?
Its not authenticated testimony so each witness he had would need to come in again under oath - but we can also bring Fullmich in to have him testify about his conclusions to so many interviews! Its on the table to figure out what we need from him. Thanks for bringing that up and looking out - he has a ton of info to draw from!
Sooner the better, as I am sure Dr Fuellmich would have other - not publicly aired - information and details that need investigating/collating beforehand.
Also his experiences successfully suing Deutsche Bank (& as an employee with Deutsche Bank), especially given the "involvement" of said Bank - J Epstein was a favourite customer and ------
😂🤣😂🤣 Lower their fees! 😂🤣😂🤣 Stuck-up US attorneys?! There may be a very few.
Haha hoity toity attorneys and their snobby - "wont work for less than $200k year" routine
Yep, that pretty much sums it up. It's really sad.
Just an idea: could ALL the attorneys fighting globally not be brought into some sort of loose coalition the purpose being to bolster each other's cases? Perhaps by filing amicus briefs wherever possible. Although almost no one I talk to believes it, this IS now or never for humanity. One of my learned legal friends, when I last spoke to him last year, said not to worry, there was no cabal at work, and if anyone so much as laid a pinkie on our South African Constitution he would personally leap up and crush them in court. My god, this rocks my confidence in the legal profession. I always imagined they were the ones on whom no one could pull a fast one. Yet across the world our rights have been trampled before their eyes. And as you say IOJ where the hell are they?
When RFK jnr gets into the WH he could start a state funded foundation akin to the WEFs Young Leaders program but to prepare politicians, scientists, lawyers etc for careers serving humanity rather than mamon. And to develop critical thinking in young people. Teachers at this institution would be mentors who guide people's development rather than telling them what to think. They would be people like IOJ and Mike Yeadon who have a proven track record of courage and integrity. All children start off inherently idealistic and then somewhere along the way the system sucks it out of them.
But first things first : let's give what we can to support IOJ to win this case!
Interest of Justice,
You are not ranting, you are amazing with what you have and are achieving.
Your missive here is totally justified!! The comparisons between yourselves and the American legal approach is self evident.
Many years ago I wrote to an American group, saying "Americans worship daily at the Altar of the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR". This is not sarcasm but a statement to hopefully wake this sadly money obsessed Country up.
America is so much the root of the evil that has and is permeating into all levels of and areas in OUR World. They have so so much to answer for and desperately need to attend to their own housekeeping and disasters they have and are perpetrating onto humanity.
Money and war is seen as the solution by the USA. Their ways are NOT right, and the World is fed up with them being forced on it- that has been true for a long, long time.
IOJ , I am sure many people in the World who have tried but never had true Justice, despite paying dearly for legal "help" because of the Legal world being so obsessed and arrogant about their little World and charging ridiculous amounts , while protecting an inadequate system that has and is long overdue to very close examination and restructure, also Practitioners in the legal worl can be ignorant and too lazy to KNOW the Law, and the client pays for that ignorance too.
I always remember an Australian legal employed by a "leading" Sydney law firm, Henry Davis York, who, when I pointed out a glaring basic error in my purchase of a piece of land, said "all care given NO responsibility taken, we can take that case to Court for you" to me a cheap, cheap person who was a low class opportunist in short a criminal. He was a friend who lived in the same Sydney suburb.
I learnt my lesson early and have done my own legal work since that time. The few times I was forced to consult a legal person they were bona fide legals.
But Interest of Justice are TRUE LAWYERS and I urge people to contribute to IOJ in this battle for humanity. Their personal qualities are exemplary and shine through in their work.
Thank you for your efforts.
Please correct the date in your article from 2013 to 2023 to make it believable!