States Must Use LAW To Allow A Variety Of Voices, Rather Than Ensuring Its Monopoly In Decision-Making Demands UN, WHO and States Stop Attacking Scientific Experts And Enable Them To Help Make Policy
Alas, using broad-brush, ill-defined, dubious and emotive terms such as 'far right movement', 'migrants,' refugees' & 'lgbt+persons' in her opening remarks suggests the speaker has an inherent bias. Do human rights trump the rights of all other non-human species (which the human species are inextricably linked to) or do the human rights of selected 'person' trump the human rights of non-selected persons? Perhaps the Universal Declaration itself needs a revision. As one of its co-authors Stephane Hessel has lamented, it was never intended to give any humans the unbridled freedoms of a fox in a henhouse.
thought the exact same thing about her clear bias - and she buried all the really awesome stuff at the end. We also whole-heartedly agree about the treaties and human rights!
Alas, using broad-brush, ill-defined, dubious and emotive terms such as 'far right movement', 'migrants,' refugees' & 'lgbt+persons' in her opening remarks suggests the speaker has an inherent bias. Do human rights trump the rights of all other non-human species (which the human species are inextricably linked to) or do the human rights of selected 'person' trump the human rights of non-selected persons? Perhaps the Universal Declaration itself needs a revision. As one of its co-authors Stephane Hessel has lamented, it was never intended to give any humans the unbridled freedoms of a fox in a henhouse.
thought the exact same thing about her clear bias - and she buried all the really awesome stuff at the end. We also whole-heartedly agree about the treaties and human rights!
jihadjoe jihadjoe governmentally ill from head to toe https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/bidens-requiring-dissenter-scientists