Stop The TREATY! 2 Week countdown Begins NOW - They Are Resuming Treaty Talks In 2 Weeks! IoJ Sends Formal Letter To The WHO INB Just Before The Tenth Meeting: IOJ Is Demanding To Attend.
Stop The TREATY! 2 Week countdown Begins NOW - They Are Resuming Treaty Talks In 2 Weeks! IoJ Sends Formal Letter To The WHO INB Just Before The Tenth Meeting: IOJ Is Demanding To Attend.
We wrote to see if WHO will continue excluding us, or if it's true that ALL "interested and relevant stakeholders" are really invited 16-17 July 2024 09:30–12:00, 14:00–17:00 CET, Geneva, Switzerland
Thats crazy. WHO is doing SUCH an excellent job!. They got us a 97% false positive PCR test so we could all diagnose the intense threat from the 97% asymptomatic threat as a pandemic!!! Don't you love their non vaccines? They allegedly save lives! OK they suck - DEFUND THE WHO - THEY CANT FIGURE OUT WHAT A DIAGNOSTIC IS AND APPROVED GENE THERAPY AS IF IT'S A VACCINE!!! SHUT EM DOWN!
100%!!! And let us not forget what they really are: a criminal cartel masquerading as a benevolent “health” organization... and how about Tedros’s sordid past?... and the fact that their two biggest funding interests are the CCP and Bill Gates for crying out loud! Time to pull the plug and try them all for racketeering, because that’s exactly what they are doing!
According to WHO when we were chosen it was because we are a "relevant" stakeholder": defined by WHO INB as: "A group or person having important relevant information to share on pandemic preparedness and response".
In the case of WHO its through their FOIA's dept and then when they screw you over like us you go to the internal oversight... when that doesn't work you gotta sue in a national court and depending on the area and circumstance they will elevate it to an international human rights case (although like a lawyer that sues the WHO a lot says - they will probably just settle) - all that JUST to communicate haha. They don't negotiate well... ESPECIALLY criminal orgs... the only thing you can really do is jump in it to win it, be a stakeholder expecting to be marginalized to build a real case against them. We did that with WHO and we will follow through the whole process - ALL just to communicate to our governments: hey there did you ever stop to think WHO sucks? They are not doing their duty right and harming public interest so you need to EXIT the WHO!
People like us certainly are not going to affect their plans or negotiate anything with the org - communicating with them and trying to get in their meetings is all to influence the Member States and show them first hand by an injured party that they have a failure on their hands by trusting in WHO and must take steps to get out.
One meeting we were INVITED by WHO to attend the WHO's first civil society consultation. We came to "communicate" and "consult" and was CENSORED by Jeremy Farrar - all just for us exposing the UN say we own the climate scam science. Well, guess what? It's in court right now and WHO Internal Oversight referred it to national authorities. So communication will need to go through a Judge because they just censor and cherrypick! Our job is to expose the breaches of duties and key lies. This is how we do it!
I think the WHO should be shut down totally
Thats crazy. WHO is doing SUCH an excellent job!. They got us a 97% false positive PCR test so we could all diagnose the intense threat from the 97% asymptomatic threat as a pandemic!!! Don't you love their non vaccines? They allegedly save lives! OK they suck - DEFUND THE WHO - THEY CANT FIGURE OUT WHAT A DIAGNOSTIC IS AND APPROVED GENE THERAPY AS IF IT'S A VACCINE!!! SHUT EM DOWN!
100%!!! And let us not forget what they really are: a criminal cartel masquerading as a benevolent “health” organization... and how about Tedros’s sordid past?... and the fact that their two biggest funding interests are the CCP and Bill Gates for crying out loud! Time to pull the plug and try them all for racketeering, because that’s exactly what they are doing!
👍 - and all those who are anti-life !
Question is, what is their definition of “relevant”?
According to WHO when we were chosen it was because we are a "relevant" stakeholder": defined by WHO INB as: "A group or person having important relevant information to share on pandemic preparedness and response".
Then after we dissented they cut us off lol... so much for "relevance" - bastards!
How does one even communicate and negotiate with a criminal organization whose entire existence is predicated on lies?
In the case of WHO its through their FOIA's dept and then when they screw you over like us you go to the internal oversight... when that doesn't work you gotta sue in a national court and depending on the area and circumstance they will elevate it to an international human rights case (although like a lawyer that sues the WHO a lot says - they will probably just settle) - all that JUST to communicate haha. They don't negotiate well... ESPECIALLY criminal orgs... the only thing you can really do is jump in it to win it, be a stakeholder expecting to be marginalized to build a real case against them. We did that with WHO and we will follow through the whole process - ALL just to communicate to our governments: hey there did you ever stop to think WHO sucks? They are not doing their duty right and harming public interest so you need to EXIT the WHO!
People like us certainly are not going to affect their plans or negotiate anything with the org - communicating with them and trying to get in their meetings is all to influence the Member States and show them first hand by an injured party that they have a failure on their hands by trusting in WHO and must take steps to get out.
One meeting we were INVITED by WHO to attend the WHO's first civil society consultation. We came to "communicate" and "consult" and was CENSORED by Jeremy Farrar - all just for us exposing the UN say we own the climate scam science. Well, guess what? It's in court right now and WHO Internal Oversight referred it to national authorities. So communication will need to go through a Judge because they just censor and cherrypick! Our job is to expose the breaches of duties and key lies. This is how we do it!
#AbolishTheWHO