Sage Hanna gets credit for the DEEP DIVE into the MONEY behind the NARRATIVE that sparked the discussion, and Conspiracy Sarah's post today kicks the discussion up a couple notches!
“Covid” IS NOT a ”non-existent disease.” It is acute oxidative stress caused by the TOXICITY of NANOTECHNOLOGY. People are POISONED.
Acute oxidative stress leads to APOPTOSIS, or cell death.
Ivermectin is a zinc ionophore. Zinc is fundamental to the prevention of OXIDATIVE STRESS and OXIDATIVE DAMAGE.
In addition, zinc ionophores stop apoptosis or cell death.
In addition, fertility returned after Ivermectin treatment was discontinued.
I've seen it work wonders with Covid, and I have no problem using it in large quantities because it is both safe and effective.
And as for Tim, when I presented him with research papers on the subject, he simply blocked me, so he has some agenda or some faith in pushing this one-sided narrative.
He blocks you lol - no debate - good to know. Well its like a chicken and egg debate - which came first? Was it the fake covid pandemic based on covid symptoms where no nano was rolled out yet? When was the nanotech introduced which you say mimics the symptoms of what they call covid, because we thought there was a nanotech rollout AFTER the alleged covid pandemic was declared.... What were the symptoms when declared and are you saying it was always nanotech being mistaken for covid? Why not just think it's flu rebranded since that existed at the time of the declaration of pandemic? Just confused on the timing how it could be nano symptoms only if the nano was rolled out almost a year after?
But we can beat around the bushes indefinitely, go nowhere - this nanotechnology and "internet of bodies" and so on - it's murder, not progress. The toxicity studies of these materials are crystal clear, so if you're a lawyer, what's your next move in this matter?
No, nanotechnology is introduced in many products - and it has been introduced before - in flu vaccines, food, antibiotics, even saline solution... Then of course as a "PCR test" and in masks. If you already have underlying oxidative stress that obese people, older people with co-morbidities, diabetes and so on (that is, wasn't the main population that came out with acute Covid symptoms?) you will get very ill or die.
Our findings suggest that obesity is significantly associated with increased severity and higher mortality among COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the inclusion of obesity or its surrogate body mass index in prognostic scores and improvement of guidelines for patient care management is recommended.
COVID-19 patients who were both type-2 diabetics and obese had a significantly higher risk of post-diagnosis hospitalization and severe disease development. These findings suggest that efforts to manage diabetes and weight may reduce the severity of COVID-19.
Etc.
It is in fact pretty simple. Acute oxidative stress / damage is the cause of severity of this poisoning outcome
Those "doctors" who don't want to talk about the obvious poisoning of nanotechnology are either ignorant or pretenders.
In the case of Malone & Company, they are not ignorant
As stated above, I suspect that attempts to discredit IVM and HCQ are, along with the "no such thing as virus" hypothesis, giant Pharma psyops. Sad to see good folks on our side falling for it. Focus on the real problem, the onerous, oppressive juggernaut of corporate medical practice
Yes Jon, the real problem is definitely the onerous, oppressive juggernaut of corporate medical practice, which is the core focus for sure - but we are pretty convinced the virus thing is a psy op and not the other way around. In reality though we have been calling for the virus vs no virus debate and TA-DA - no one in the virus camp wants to debate Yeadon or the no virus crew. The ivermectin pushers funding is pretty shady... just saying!
OK, I appreciate your respectful reply. Debate fine with me,but as a political activist, since 1966, not a micro-biologist, I think it pales in significance to the titanic battle we face. My advice as an elder, give it a rest and sharpen the focus.
Is there any form of medical malpractice bigger than a world wide campaign to instill fear of a nonexistent virus to generate billions of profit from toxic jabs that have killed millions of people and injured countless millions more? As long as people continue to believe viruses exist and are causative of illness we will continue to be beleaguered by this massive medical malpractice. .
Notice: I did not say a word about viruses (" Franky, my dear, I don't give a damn") but from whatever cause, millions of people got a peculiar illness, including myself, in 2020-2023, and huge numbers who took IVM survived, while many of those who followed "doctor's orders" succumbed. THAT is a reality!
Isn't it wild there is a whole industry to profit off fake pandemics? It's such a drain on society but a river of profits for the fakesters terrorizing us all with fear for "vaccine uptake". Truly disgusting
Steve Kirsch did go toe to toe with Andy Kaufman, which was arguably one of the best debates of the genre given the entrenched positions on both side. (Of course, both could simply be freemasonic actor stooges at this point, furthering the psyop etc but it was a great debate, nevertheless…)
We called for the great debate in the above comment, but lean toward the fact there is apparently shady funding of ivermectin pushing - and if it's anti fertility as stated by Dr. Yeadon that is something we are PROUD to warn people to look into. We can't all agree on everything Mario!
Normally you are supposed to change the order. first is show me the proof, them after review you conclude "it's not true". You decided its not true with no proof. - even today Tess Lawrie agrees Dr. Yeadon may be right!
Mario, how about instead of saying I am not supporting you anymore! Present it with irrefutable proof and educate us with your findings! This is really important for us to do. We are all here to find the truth and nothing but the truth! I personally have Not had any Covid and non in my family members who have not had the gene editing injections. I have worked as a cleaner in the most dirtiest places and been on crowded places, worked with vaccinated workmates who keep continuing to have multiple Covid, worked in the nursing homes and yet have Not had Covid!.
I grow up in the farm and remembering that we always get over flu symptoms quickly without any medical intervention, if we got cough my mother will just get some herbs and let us drink it. We rarely go to the doctor or hospital as a family! My hometown was a very remote area where the town hospital is 4 hours away by boat only. But people live ip to more than hundred years. My Nan live up to 102. My father live up to 95 but he died because he had a bad fall and hit his head causing blood clots in his brain!
So ,I’m trying to understand the 2 camps of the there is virus versus there is no virus! Because of my experience working in the most dirtiest places and not getting sick… I yet to decide! But I am always open to any information!
What doesn't add up is that we are exposed consistently to assorted assaults, e.g. 5G, GMO's, and aerial spraying, but all of a sudden millions, like me, came down ill but recovered (those of us who used "the good stuff" and avoided the vax with all its dishonesty). Yet we are still subject to those same irritants. There seems to me that there WAS contagions from something, whether virus of bacteria, I don't care (WRONG BATTLE). We need to keep our eye on the prize: Liberation from the tyranny of " One empire, under surveillance, withe deceit and oppression for all."
We did lose our sense of smell entirely which never happened before... just saying - We agree and don't care what it was either - as long as the health authorities stop pretending its a globally transmissible virus we need protection from!
I put it to us all to think about things... We have had a global 02 reduction of 1% in our atmosphere. Does anyone think that certain bacteria may already be mutating to take advantage of that?
Not a study really on point GNP isn't LNP. The reason lipids were used in this way as nanoparticles is they get to go everywhere in the body.
The issue is with how the payload for those particles are created and the residual contamination levels in the shots. Inject mice with e-coli interperoneally and it seems to immediately upregulate NF-ΚB.
Thats when the shit hits the old proverbial fan. Graphine is used to my knowledge as a modRNA screen and so it can get graphine particles into the shots. (if anyone knows this is wrong please give me a reference).
Amen,it's disgusting what the world has come to. The scope of the genocide against humanity and being called crazy for noticing is a wonderful feeling. It makes me all warm, and fuzzy feeling inside. I believe we are on the same team sir. God be with you
Problem is Jon as with any Rx drug the devil is in always the details. IVM has been used as a constant against river blindness. Acute usage doesn't seem to have anything other than fertility suppression impacts to add to it. Any follow up on whether fertility comes back after long term use? I haven't seen any trials done that confirm it.
Looks like the Greens get their wish in NZ Jon. Jabs can be forced on the unvaccinated
I think I heard Dr. Yeadon say a while back that its effective anti parasite but he also explains now that he learned it's anti fertility... So it could be effective for parasites, but he is saying It's just not effective for a non existent disease caused by a non existent virus ; )
I was blocked when I said my kids are grown up and so what? I have FenBen IVM combo sitting around as am diagnosed with prostate cancer. Is IVM reverse psychology? It is a mind fuck.
I have a friend who was using 18mg Iver several days a week when he was diagnosed (i.e. prostate) but also had more comprehensive treatment. So far, he is doing fine as far as I know. I also use CDS, but I didn’t need it for cancer, so I don’t have direct experience with it for cancer. However, I use it daily and think it’s great (chlorine dioxide solution)
None of you are considering the theories that Covid was triangulated 4g via WiFi modems or Smart TVs. This would explain a real disease that was not contagious.
Good for you. It's a damn shame that it's so hard to gain useful knowledge about issues concerning remedies, healthy living,and such. Everyone seems to have some sort of game on for whatever reason.
I found ivermectin while battling morgellons. And yes,among other things, I found it was helpful for my symptoms.
If anyone like Tim thinks everyone is going crazy with delusional paratosis they should take a long concerned stare at someone who has morgellons. They would probably cry,and beg forgiveness for being such an idiot.
Ivermectin was helpful to me, but it lacked the closure I needed from stopping the self assembly nano technology I've been afflicted with. That being said, I ran across Dr Ana meouche, ( that's not her last name) because I can't pronounce or spell it. She is ongoing in much research of what's being implemented against humanity. She is my hero, because she solved the problem of the self assembly mystery simply with EDTA and vitamin c. WHAT!!!!!!! OH YES.
HATS OF TO YOU FOR STANDING UP TO THE HYPOCRISY. SALUTE!!!
Based on the provided search results, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative effect on dung beetles. Here are the key findings:
Sub-lethal disorders: Low doses of ivermectin cause sensory and locomotor disorders in dung beetles, affecting their olfactory and locomotor capacity (Verdú et al., 2015).
Population decline: Research suggests that the use of ivermectin in livestock may contribute to the decline of dung beetle populations in Mediterranean ecosystems (Verdú et al., 2015).
Disruption of ecosystem functioning: Ivermectin residues in dung can disrupt dung beetle diversity, soil properties, and ecosystem functioning (Lumaret et al., 2018).
Impaired dung beetle behavior: Ivermectin treatments for cattle can affect the attraction of dung beetles to cow pats, with some species being repelled or attracted to treated dung (Errouissi et al., 2010).
Long-term effects: The use of ivermectin can have long-term consequences for dung beetle populations and ecosystem functioning, even after the initial treatment has worn off (Lumaret et al., 2018).
In summary, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative impact on dung beetles, affecting their behavior, population dynamics, and ecosystem functioning.
Is ivermectin really a genocidal tool of the globalists? Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD
The emerged globalist agenda
It is now clear to many including me that the globalist agenda is one of eugenics, with the aim of significantly reducing world’s population and changing the genetics of the remainder of us.
The possibility that ivermectin, through a potential effect on fertility, may be part of the globalists dastardly genocidal plan is a fairly novel one that I will explore here today.
The notion that ivermectin may cause infertility has been floating around since 2021 based on decade-old, mainly animal studies. After scanning such studies in 2021, I did not find the claim to be credible based on the supporting evidence. The animal studies being shared as proof, I found to involve very high doses of ivermectin, given for long periods with very short term follow up. Anything given in high doses, including overdosing on water, can cause harm. In my opinion as a research scientist with expertise in evaluating bodies of evidence, much more research was needed before making a claim that ivermectin is harmful to human fertility.
Back in 2021, when this assertion was doing the rounds on social media, it felt to me to be more like a distraction, as it does now. However, due to repeated public engagement on this topic by my associate in the health and freedom movement, Dr Mike Yeadon, I have decided to revisit it.
Dr Yeadon, ex-drug company executive, turned truther, has vehemently stated publicly that “ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins [he has] ever come across”.
I am a little surprised by Dr Yeadon’s certainty on this matter. However, since Dr Yeadon’s area of interest in drug development was primarily in respiratory anti-allergy and inflammation drugs, I expect he knows a lot about ivermectin, which is known to be an excellent, low cost anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating old medicine.
My first thoughts on re-engaging this topic are:
Ivermectin is used to primarily to treat illness. It seems pretty good at clearing parasites and modulating the immune system to help fight inflammation, including inflammation associated with cancer. It’s anti-coagulant properties are a bonus for recipients of the Covid-19 shots that are known to cause clotting. So, it is being widely used beyond the BIRD recommendations for ‘Covid-19’. As noted by the Nobel prize awarded in 2015, ivermectin seems to offer immeasurable benefit to humans and animals alike for a variety of conditions.
Some questions related to the circulating claims arise:
If the globalists are secretly pro-ivermectin and are delighted that its widespread use for worms and other infections, inflammation, and cancer will contribute to genocide, why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences? Why aren’t we being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with Gates’ money and media coverage?
Having been given billions of times worldwide, ivermectin clearly hasn’t managed to wipe us out yet so doesn’t seem to be a very good genocidal tool if it is such. Through our air, food and water, there are many more direct ways the globalists can harm and are harming us. In addition, they’re angling for more and forced lipid nanoparticle (LNP) biotech products to be given by our governments to us in the guise of ‘vaccines’.
Are the animal studies being shared as evidence that ivermectin causes infertility really reflective of how ivermectin is being used in living men and women?
Let’s take a look…
Okay, so I have just taken a look at the first study on Tim Truth’s list[1], the reference shared with me by Dr Yeadon. It’s a 2015 Iranian study conducted in rabbits[2]. It is not clear whether this particular study underwent ethics approval or peer review. The journal is not indexed.
Here are a few considerations. The study comprises different experiments. In the first experiment, 48 little female rabbits weighing between 1.2 and 2 kilograms were divided into eight groups. Thirty-six (36) were given ivermectin in a daily injection for 8 weeks (56 days). Thus, for rabbits weighing 2 kilograms, for example, the total amount of ivermectin given over the 56 days was 448 mg.
This ivermectin dose is extremely high.
If the equivalent study were to be conducted in human subjects, a total dose for a 60 kilogram woman would be 13.44 grams. The latter amounts to a daily dose of 240 mg per day for 56 days, which is 20 x 12 mg tablets daily – two strips of 10 tablets for 56 days!).
What happened to the rabbits receiving ultra-high doses of ivermectin?
The poor little rabbits. After their 56 day trial, they had blood drawn from their hearts for hormone tests. These rabbits were then “sacrificed” and had their liver, kidneys and lungs examined microscopically[3].
Another batch of 48 female rabbits were used for the second experiment. The second batch of rabbits were ‘treated’ the same way as the first batch over 56 days and then mated with fertile male rabbits on two occasions over a two-month period. Most of rabbits receiving ivermectin did not have offspring during those two months.
What can we deduce from this?
Female rabbits given daily ivermectin injections for 56 days at doses 20 times the equivalent dose normally used by humans is associated with infertility in female rabbits up to two months following administration.
Did these female rabbits remain infertile once the ivermectin cleared their system? We don’t know. On the second mating there were more offspring than the first, so with time it is quite likely that fertility might have returned to normal after a time.
Would giving a human female 20 x 12 mg ivermectin tablets a day for 56 days similarly impact fertility? Quite possibly…
Would it be reversible? Quite possibly…we just don’t know because no scientist is likely to do such a study like this in human beings. It would be pointless and dangerous, wouldn’t it?
Can we deduce from this study that ivermectin is an effective eugenics tools for the globalist depopulation agenda? No, I don’t think so.
So we can have a look at the other studies together too - or you can do it yourselves. In general, though, I feel a good dollop of common sense is needed at this stage.
My conclusions related to this one: Animal testing is cruel.
If this study isn’t proof that experimenting on animals should be stopped, I don’t know what is!
In addition, the fact that such a high total dose did not kill the little rabbits seems to prove what pharmacovigilance databases testify to, which is just how SAFE ivermectin is!
Do I think the globalists might try to use ivermectin as part of their depopulation agenda?
Yes, I do. It is clear that the globalists want to get access to our bodies to inject stuff. It occurred to me as far back as 2021 that they may well be planning an ivermectin injection to be rolled out in due course, and we see these being developed by the usual culprits.
So although the answer to the question above is YES, it is not for the reasons put forward; rather because the ivermectin injection deployed by these sociopaths would most likely contain the same harmful nanotechnology as the Covid-19 biotechnology, with LNPs and assorted other toxic ingredients.
I will invite Dr Mike Yeadon to discuss this and other things soon in a public forum so we can explore this and the other interesting matters in this extraordinary time of great change!
Now, what if the psy op goes as deep as Dr.s losing their licenses? What if that was part of it? If so, it was very forward thinking and clever because it seems so implausible that you brought it up as the reason you can't fathom its a nefarious plan at the higher levels... In our opinion it could go very deep down the rabbit hole - just publicize a few Dr.s problems and TA-DA... its a complete narrative and throws everyone off the scent... We want the trials and judges to tell us whats legit after hearing all the evidence, but heavily lean toward believing Dr. Yeadon!
Interest of Justice - You are just repeating a statement of Yeadon. Where is the proof of that? Show me the proof that Ivermectin is an anti fertility drug.
IOJ: While I appreciate very much your pursuit of the gangster class, this line of reason flies in the face of many thousands of lives that WERE saved by the use of those products on people who were indeed quite sick. Multiple doctors have reported that patients recovered quickly after being very ill indeed. Your view here is not helpful, and likely part of a giant psyop intended to keep us opponents of Big Pharma divided. Please escape from that trap. To say thew was no illness is, frankly absurd. I myself, though elderly. was rather ill for 2 weeks but used 'the good stuff" and recovered. So did many others who refused the vax.
It's interesting because we are convinced the illnesses are real, people got sick, but we think it it was always a bad strain of flu. The reason we say that is we learned they always tested for flu in one building but when covid hit they sent everyone to the epidemiologist building to be checked for covid - They no longer checked for flu!!!!!!
They used PCR to check for covid but it made false positives and flu magically went away. It all adds up to people really got sick, but the data shows it was just like every year. As we study the actual data we cant find a rise in actual illness to attribute to covid. It's so easy to say this is a psy op we are sucked into (we WILL continue to learn and get to the bottom of this) but the evidence does not support a real covid pandemic. Thank god you recovered from whatever it was and did not take the "vax"!!!!
Yes and now he's mostly ashamed of the industry as a whole and says he has learned a lot about the inner workings which he was previously unaware of... Courageous and truthful Whistleblowers always come out from the inside of the belly of the Beast - that is where the whistleblowers come from - no real fault of their own, and if there was fault, they rise above, get out and Whistleblow!
"Dr. Yeadon asks Dr. Tess Lawrie to publicly to state why she continues to promote “early treatment” for a non-existent illness. Fair question."....AND I am asking the no-virus camp to denounce the shots....why do we need to vaccinate against something that does not exist....right?
I suggest you also have a look at the effects on Cholesterol too- as per Mejbcart's most recent stack.
I have been pondering how the MoA of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloraquin since Dec 2020, fit into the BS narratives and planned convid saga- through the already existing BS cholesterol narrative- thats a psyop being going on far longer than Covid.😉
These things are to lower cholesterol levels... now ask why? No not the BS "bad fat" justification. Anyone who thinks about biology of cells, know that you freaking need cholesterol. Then have a look at how cholesterol is activated...😉
OMG ,,,, Fooled Again 🤦♀️ ,,,, 🙏 Mike Yeadon & I OJ ,,, ist time I’ve heard this IMPORTANT Info , THANK YOU SO MUCH , unfortunately I too had Ivermectin on list of ‘what to do ‘ despite researching - Fooled Again ,🙏💚
You are most welcome - we thought it's worth sharing, even if it loses us some readers because its obviously so contentious that it makes some people mad! We bought a ton of ivermectin and when we got sick (seemed like mild flu) we took it, but honestly did not notice any miracle cure - it just was a cold for a few days and ivermectin didn't seem to do anything in our experience. We first heard it from Tim Truth and was shocked, but he puts up studies so it's hard not to pay attention and at least research more into it! EVERYTHING is a damn conspiracy - even the fringe conspiracy theories like the government is suppressing ivermectin because it really works - lol - Fooled us all a long time - so we are all speaking out as we wake up. Sage Hanna put it best when asking us to ask ourselves how we became such fierce defenders of a big pharma product in the first place? A well coordinated campaign....
A genuinely good place with good people (and I'm not saying this lightly) to take a deep dive into the very shady world of IVM. See pinned messages as the best source of having it all together.
"In addition, in tissue culture, at concentrations higher than anthelmintic concentrations, ivermectin shows antiviral, antimalarial, antimetabolic, and anticancer effects."
While a good pitch for Ivermectin to treat precisely 4 issues, we must ask you to put this in context:
Was covid a virus that viral drugs can fix? Is covid Malaria, a metobolic issue or cancer?
We see 4 uses only for Ivermectin in that article - none of which make sense, especially since covid is not a virus caused set of symptoms. How does this fit in the picture? A bit confused!
The real question should be " Is it just ivermectin - or poisoned ivermectin"?
As someone who drenched and used ivermectin pour on for thousands of cattle and sheep and usually got a heavy dose when doing so my questions would be:
why didn't that effect my fertility at all?
why did we not notice any reductions in the breeding of our stock? As farmers any % reduction in fertility would have been noticed - that was the business after all.
I don't doubt at all that the ivermectin and hydroxy were a great reverse psychology psyop but that has to do with these being poisoned with nanotech and not the ivermectin alone. I also don't doubt that the donated ivermectin given to African countries would have had sterility agents added, just as the early donated shots for other purposes did as evidenced by the African church research going way back.
Perhaps this was why the main manufacturers of hydroxy in Canada were murdered just prior to the latest scamdemic. They may not have agreed to a poisoning of their product either.
Yes, I was initially sucked in too and bought ivermectin from India at the early stages, and later on horse paste. After inspecting them we found most were contaminated with the new tech. Even better today is that anyone buying pet or fish medicines have no recourse as they are taking a vet product and this means no liability for the sellers or manufacturers.
The big issue for me is the denial of the tech inside people that is easily proven via that pesky bluetooth signal coming from human bodies. No better smoking gun than that for evidence can be had.
Does unpoisoned ivermectin have a beneficial role to play still for some purposes? Helping to heal the endothelial lining of our veins that are under attack, componants of which are a part of the calamari as per Dr Arne Burkhadt, is the reason I still take it sporadically in an uncontaminated form.
¨If ivermectin was more widely used, there’d be no need for vaccines.¨
Dr Mike Yeadon May 10, 2021
Why are we being lied to about Covid? There’s no good reason By Dr Mike Yeadon - May 10, 2021
BE in no doubt, among the reasons that voices and opinions like mine are never heard in the main media is extreme censorship more suited to China than a liberal democracy. Please allow me to illustrate with an example close to my heart why it is high time for us to change our response.
Ivermectin is one of the WHO’s ‘essential drugs’ which all countries should have access to. It’s very cheap as its patent has long expired; it’s one of the most-used drugs in world history; it’s extraordinarily safe; it is often life-saving against parasitic infections. It is also one of the best-established pharmaceutical treatments for Covid-19, showing benefit in every stage of the disease, in multiple independent clinical trials of varying quality. On January 3, 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie attempted to alert the Prime Minister to the potential of ivermectin.
Her video here was pulled from YouTube within hours of posting, though it survives on Vimeo. The paper by the FLCCC group of US intensivists (whose survival rates for severe Covid-19 are best in class) that was the inspiration for Dr Lawrie’s work was accepted after extensive open peer review (including two career employees of the FDA) and ‘provisionally accepted’ by the ‘open science’ journal Frontiers in Pharmacology. The screenshot of the abstract tweeted by Clare Craig shown here attracted more than 100,000 views. Then, mysteriously, it was rejected and pulled by the Frontiers editor in chief. It is still here in cached form though the Ministry of Truth has been at work and placed it in a memory hole, so no trace survives on Frontiers’ own website.
Intended for a Special Issue on ‘repurposed drugs’ for Covid-19, various guest editors were so incensed at this behaviour that they resigned in protest. You can read their letter here. They concluded that ‘these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by Frontiers.’ Fortunately this major paper is now published by the American Journal of Therapeutics and can be read in its final form here.
This nevertheless successfully delayed by nearly six months its circulation to leading public health bodies starting mid-November. A copy was sent to Sir Jeremy Farrar (boss of the Wellcome Trust and member of Sage) who passed it on to Professor Peter Horby (also on Sage), amongst others, on November 18, 2020. So the efficacy of ivermectin must be well known to the Government’s advisers, but they have done nothing about it. Likewise, the formal and rigorous meta-analysis performed by Dr Tess Lawrie’s team at the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd has been communicated to Matt Hancock, but without reply.
I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, big pharma (here’s Merck, who originally developed & marketed it) and regulatory agencies will tell you is that ivermectin doesn’t work in Covid-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won’t, for I would win easily...¨ Read More
I've been pointing these things out for years. Every time I do the big pharma shills for Ivermectin come out in force in the comments. No awareness about the terrain.
This is just a one-sided approach to Ivermectin.
“Covid” IS NOT a ”non-existent disease.” It is acute oxidative stress caused by the TOXICITY of NANOTECHNOLOGY. People are POISONED.
Acute oxidative stress leads to APOPTOSIS, or cell death.
Ivermectin is a zinc ionophore. Zinc is fundamental to the prevention of OXIDATIVE STRESS and OXIDATIVE DAMAGE.
In addition, zinc ionophores stop apoptosis or cell death.
In addition, fertility returned after Ivermectin treatment was discontinued.
I've seen it work wonders with Covid, and I have no problem using it in large quantities because it is both safe and effective.
And as for Tim, when I presented him with research papers on the subject, he simply blocked me, so he has some agenda or some faith in pushing this one-sided narrative.
He blocks you lol - no debate - good to know. Well its like a chicken and egg debate - which came first? Was it the fake covid pandemic based on covid symptoms where no nano was rolled out yet? When was the nanotech introduced which you say mimics the symptoms of what they call covid, because we thought there was a nanotech rollout AFTER the alleged covid pandemic was declared.... What were the symptoms when declared and are you saying it was always nanotech being mistaken for covid? Why not just think it's flu rebranded since that existed at the time of the declaration of pandemic? Just confused on the timing how it could be nano symptoms only if the nano was rolled out almost a year after?
If you read my posts, everything is there, all the links, why this is being done, what is being used, including this:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315221010243/form10-q.htm#V_009
https://outraged.substack.com/p/evidence-of-crimes-against-humanity
But we can beat around the bushes indefinitely, go nowhere - this nanotechnology and "internet of bodies" and so on - it's murder, not progress. The toxicity studies of these materials are crystal clear, so if you're a lawyer, what's your next move in this matter?
No, nanotechnology is introduced in many products - and it has been introduced before - in flu vaccines, food, antibiotics, even saline solution... Then of course as a "PCR test" and in masks. If you already have underlying oxidative stress that obese people, older people with co-morbidities, diabetes and so on (that is, wasn't the main population that came out with acute Covid symptoms?) you will get very ill or die.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9205425/ Association of Obesity With COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: An Updated Systemic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that obesity is significantly associated with increased severity and higher mortality among COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the inclusion of obesity or its surrogate body mass index in prognostic scores and improvement of guidelines for patient care management is recommended.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-96720-x Impact of overlapping risks of type 2 diabetes and obesity on coronavirus disease severity in the United States
Conclusions
COVID-19 patients who were both type-2 diabetics and obese had a significantly higher risk of post-diagnosis hospitalization and severe disease development. These findings suggest that efforts to manage diabetes and weight may reduce the severity of COVID-19.
Etc.
It is in fact pretty simple. Acute oxidative stress / damage is the cause of severity of this poisoning outcome
Those "doctors" who don't want to talk about the obvious poisoning of nanotechnology are either ignorant or pretenders.
In the case of Malone & Company, they are not ignorant
As stated above, I suspect that attempts to discredit IVM and HCQ are, along with the "no such thing as virus" hypothesis, giant Pharma psyops. Sad to see good folks on our side falling for it. Focus on the real problem, the onerous, oppressive juggernaut of corporate medical practice
Yes Jon, the real problem is definitely the onerous, oppressive juggernaut of corporate medical practice, which is the core focus for sure - but we are pretty convinced the virus thing is a psy op and not the other way around. In reality though we have been calling for the virus vs no virus debate and TA-DA - no one in the virus camp wants to debate Yeadon or the no virus crew. The ivermectin pushers funding is pretty shady... just saying!
Randomly, I'd like to just say, I appreciate your interest in justice my friend.
Thanks dear friend!
OK, I appreciate your respectful reply. Debate fine with me,but as a political activist, since 1966, not a micro-biologist, I think it pales in significance to the titanic battle we face. My advice as an elder, give it a rest and sharpen the focus.
PS As elders,we are not concerned for ourselves about our fertility. We are concerned about not dying from medical malpractice.
haha point taken!
Is there any form of medical malpractice bigger than a world wide campaign to instill fear of a nonexistent virus to generate billions of profit from toxic jabs that have killed millions of people and injured countless millions more? As long as people continue to believe viruses exist and are causative of illness we will continue to be beleaguered by this massive medical malpractice. .
Notice: I did not say a word about viruses (" Franky, my dear, I don't give a damn") but from whatever cause, millions of people got a peculiar illness, including myself, in 2020-2023, and huge numbers who took IVM survived, while many of those who followed "doctor's orders" succumbed. THAT is a reality!
Isn't it wild there is a whole industry to profit off fake pandemics? It's such a drain on society but a river of profits for the fakesters terrorizing us all with fear for "vaccine uptake". Truly disgusting
Steve Kirsch did go toe to toe with Andy Kaufman, which was arguably one of the best debates of the genre given the entrenched positions on both side. (Of course, both could simply be freemasonic actor stooges at this point, furthering the psyop etc but it was a great debate, nevertheless…)
Ok. This is enough Interest of Justice. I am not supporting you anymore.
We called for the great debate in the above comment, but lean toward the fact there is apparently shady funding of ivermectin pushing - and if it's anti fertility as stated by Dr. Yeadon that is something we are PROUD to warn people to look into. We can't all agree on everything Mario!
Divide and Conquer, the strategy of the cabal.
It is not true. It is not anti fertility. Show me the proof!
Normally you are supposed to change the order. first is show me the proof, them after review you conclude "it's not true". You decided its not true with no proof. - even today Tess Lawrie agrees Dr. Yeadon may be right!
Mario, how about instead of saying I am not supporting you anymore! Present it with irrefutable proof and educate us with your findings! This is really important for us to do. We are all here to find the truth and nothing but the truth! I personally have Not had any Covid and non in my family members who have not had the gene editing injections. I have worked as a cleaner in the most dirtiest places and been on crowded places, worked with vaccinated workmates who keep continuing to have multiple Covid, worked in the nursing homes and yet have Not had Covid!.
I grow up in the farm and remembering that we always get over flu symptoms quickly without any medical intervention, if we got cough my mother will just get some herbs and let us drink it. We rarely go to the doctor or hospital as a family! My hometown was a very remote area where the town hospital is 4 hours away by boat only. But people live ip to more than hundred years. My Nan live up to 102. My father live up to 95 but he died because he had a bad fall and hit his head causing blood clots in his brain!
So ,I’m trying to understand the 2 camps of the there is virus versus there is no virus! Because of my experience working in the most dirtiest places and not getting sick… I yet to decide! But I am always open to any information!
Agreed Anen - thanks!
Yeah, it is not a virus... but it presents itself as severe pneumonia, etc. The reason behind is the mechanism of toxicity of nanotechnology. A good article to read to comprehend it: https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
Definitely not a virus, that's for sure! Will read in a bit : ). Looking forward - thanks!
What doesn't add up is that we are exposed consistently to assorted assaults, e.g. 5G, GMO's, and aerial spraying, but all of a sudden millions, like me, came down ill but recovered (those of us who used "the good stuff" and avoided the vax with all its dishonesty). Yet we are still subject to those same irritants. There seems to me that there WAS contagions from something, whether virus of bacteria, I don't care (WRONG BATTLE). We need to keep our eye on the prize: Liberation from the tyranny of " One empire, under surveillance, withe deceit and oppression for all."
Agreed!!!!!
I agree. I don't care what it was but whatever it was, there was contagion.
We did lose our sense of smell entirely which never happened before... just saying - We agree and don't care what it was either - as long as the health authorities stop pretending its a globally transmissible virus we need protection from!
I put it to us all to think about things... We have had a global 02 reduction of 1% in our atmosphere. Does anyone think that certain bacteria may already be mutating to take advantage of that?
Not a study really on point GNP isn't LNP. The reason lipids were used in this way as nanoparticles is they get to go everywhere in the body.
The issue is with how the payload for those particles are created and the residual contamination levels in the shots. Inject mice with e-coli interperoneally and it seems to immediately upregulate NF-ΚB.
Thats when the shit hits the old proverbial fan. Graphine is used to my knowledge as a modRNA screen and so it can get graphine particles into the shots. (if anyone knows this is wrong please give me a reference).
Amen,it's disgusting what the world has come to. The scope of the genocide against humanity and being called crazy for noticing is a wonderful feeling. It makes me all warm, and fuzzy feeling inside. I believe we are on the same team sir. God be with you
At least there is a kindred tribe of those who do have the eyes to see and ears to hear! That actually does give us the warm and fuzzies : ) Polarity
Problem is Jon as with any Rx drug the devil is in always the details. IVM has been used as a constant against river blindness. Acute usage doesn't seem to have anything other than fertility suppression impacts to add to it. Any follow up on whether fertility comes back after long term use? I haven't seen any trials done that confirm it.
Looks like the Greens get their wish in NZ Jon. Jabs can be forced on the unvaccinated
And I bet Dr. Yeadon knows it, don't you? For an expert of your kind, you know well toxicity of nanotechnology.
So, Dr. Malone does.
So, Dr. Korry and many of you guys know.
So yes, Ivermectin is an effective drug
I think I heard Dr. Yeadon say a while back that its effective anti parasite but he also explains now that he learned it's anti fertility... So it could be effective for parasites, but he is saying It's just not effective for a non existent disease caused by a non existent virus ; )
You awesome.
Tim is correct about the P Glycoprotein Inhibitors and CYP3A4 Inhibitors.
I followed up on his lead and posted some of my findings to my Substack.
P Glycoprotein and CYP3A4 are two of the most crucial cleansing systems our bodies have.
They even remove Dioxins.
So why take an inhibitors of those?
Curcumin is one Quercetin is another.
The list goes on.
Aspirin is a P-Glyco Protein inducer.
Much love.
Amazing! Thank you for the critical info!
Exactly!
I was blocked when I said my kids are grown up and so what? I have FenBen IVM combo sitting around as am diagnosed with prostate cancer. Is IVM reverse psychology? It is a mind fuck.
Heard iv is good for cancer.... It's just not a miracle for a non existent disease like pushed so hard
I have a friend who was using 18mg Iver several days a week when he was diagnosed (i.e. prostate) but also had more comprehensive treatment. So far, he is doing fine as far as I know. I also use CDS, but I didn’t need it for cancer, so I don’t have direct experience with it for cancer. However, I use it daily and think it’s great (chlorine dioxide solution)
None of you are considering the theories that Covid was triangulated 4g via WiFi modems or Smart TVs. This would explain a real disease that was not contagious.
Thank you. Staying calm. Have read about CDS but will investigate further
It sounds like you punked tim out! Lol
Good for you. It's a damn shame that it's so hard to gain useful knowledge about issues concerning remedies, healthy living,and such. Everyone seems to have some sort of game on for whatever reason.
I found ivermectin while battling morgellons. And yes,among other things, I found it was helpful for my symptoms.
If anyone like Tim thinks everyone is going crazy with delusional paratosis they should take a long concerned stare at someone who has morgellons. They would probably cry,and beg forgiveness for being such an idiot.
Ivermectin was helpful to me, but it lacked the closure I needed from stopping the self assembly nano technology I've been afflicted with. That being said, I ran across Dr Ana meouche, ( that's not her last name) because I can't pronounce or spell it. She is ongoing in much research of what's being implemented against humanity. She is my hero, because she solved the problem of the self assembly mystery simply with EDTA and vitamin c. WHAT!!!!!!! OH YES.
HATS OF TO YOU FOR STANDING UP TO THE HYPOCRISY. SALUTE!!!
I think all the research is helpful. I don't mind Tim's research - if someone is trying to get pregnant, don't take ivermectin. Or know the dangers.
But if you have low saturation and you need oxygen in your cells and you need zinc in your cells, ivermectin is one of the zinc ionophores.
That's why in the so-called "Covid" it can save someone's life. Not the only one, there are more of them.
But it won't be a cure for everything and for everyone and at any given time. I wouldn't throw the baby with the bath because of one problem.
He's probably pushing the IVM debate to distract from the Virus debate.
Read The Contagion Myth by Dr Tom Cowan.
Does ivermectin kill dung beetles?
Based on the provided search results, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative effect on dung beetles. Here are the key findings:
Sub-lethal disorders: Low doses of ivermectin cause sensory and locomotor disorders in dung beetles, affecting their olfactory and locomotor capacity (Verdú et al., 2015).
Population decline: Research suggests that the use of ivermectin in livestock may contribute to the decline of dung beetle populations in Mediterranean ecosystems (Verdú et al., 2015).
Disruption of ecosystem functioning: Ivermectin residues in dung can disrupt dung beetle diversity, soil properties, and ecosystem functioning (Lumaret et al., 2018).
Impaired dung beetle behavior: Ivermectin treatments for cattle can affect the attraction of dung beetles to cow pats, with some species being repelled or attracted to treated dung (Errouissi et al., 2010).
Long-term effects: The use of ivermectin can have long-term consequences for dung beetle populations and ecosystem functioning, even after the initial treatment has worn off (Lumaret et al., 2018).
In summary, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative impact on dung beetles, affecting their behavior, population dynamics, and ecosystem functioning.
WOW! Thank you Organic Consumer!
A Better Way with Dr Tess Lawrie
Is ivermectin really a genocidal tool of the globalists? Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD
The emerged globalist agenda
It is now clear to many including me that the globalist agenda is one of eugenics, with the aim of significantly reducing world’s population and changing the genetics of the remainder of us.
The possibility that ivermectin, through a potential effect on fertility, may be part of the globalists dastardly genocidal plan is a fairly novel one that I will explore here today.
The notion that ivermectin may cause infertility has been floating around since 2021 based on decade-old, mainly animal studies. After scanning such studies in 2021, I did not find the claim to be credible based on the supporting evidence. The animal studies being shared as proof, I found to involve very high doses of ivermectin, given for long periods with very short term follow up. Anything given in high doses, including overdosing on water, can cause harm. In my opinion as a research scientist with expertise in evaluating bodies of evidence, much more research was needed before making a claim that ivermectin is harmful to human fertility.
Back in 2021, when this assertion was doing the rounds on social media, it felt to me to be more like a distraction, as it does now. However, due to repeated public engagement on this topic by my associate in the health and freedom movement, Dr Mike Yeadon, I have decided to revisit it.
Dr Yeadon, ex-drug company executive, turned truther, has vehemently stated publicly that “ivermectin is one of the most violent fertility toxins [he has] ever come across”.
I am a little surprised by Dr Yeadon’s certainty on this matter. However, since Dr Yeadon’s area of interest in drug development was primarily in respiratory anti-allergy and inflammation drugs, I expect he knows a lot about ivermectin, which is known to be an excellent, low cost anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating old medicine.
My first thoughts on re-engaging this topic are:
Ivermectin is used to primarily to treat illness. It seems pretty good at clearing parasites and modulating the immune system to help fight inflammation, including inflammation associated with cancer. It’s anti-coagulant properties are a bonus for recipients of the Covid-19 shots that are known to cause clotting. So, it is being widely used beyond the BIRD recommendations for ‘Covid-19’. As noted by the Nobel prize awarded in 2015, ivermectin seems to offer immeasurable benefit to humans and animals alike for a variety of conditions.
Some questions related to the circulating claims arise:
If the globalists are secretly pro-ivermectin and are delighted that its widespread use for worms and other infections, inflammation, and cancer will contribute to genocide, why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences? Why aren’t we being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with Gates’ money and media coverage?
Having been given billions of times worldwide, ivermectin clearly hasn’t managed to wipe us out yet so doesn’t seem to be a very good genocidal tool if it is such. Through our air, food and water, there are many more direct ways the globalists can harm and are harming us. In addition, they’re angling for more and forced lipid nanoparticle (LNP) biotech products to be given by our governments to us in the guise of ‘vaccines’.
Are the animal studies being shared as evidence that ivermectin causes infertility really reflective of how ivermectin is being used in living men and women?
Let’s take a look…
Okay, so I have just taken a look at the first study on Tim Truth’s list[1], the reference shared with me by Dr Yeadon. It’s a 2015 Iranian study conducted in rabbits[2]. It is not clear whether this particular study underwent ethics approval or peer review. The journal is not indexed.
Here are a few considerations. The study comprises different experiments. In the first experiment, 48 little female rabbits weighing between 1.2 and 2 kilograms were divided into eight groups. Thirty-six (36) were given ivermectin in a daily injection for 8 weeks (56 days). Thus, for rabbits weighing 2 kilograms, for example, the total amount of ivermectin given over the 56 days was 448 mg.
This ivermectin dose is extremely high.
If the equivalent study were to be conducted in human subjects, a total dose for a 60 kilogram woman would be 13.44 grams. The latter amounts to a daily dose of 240 mg per day for 56 days, which is 20 x 12 mg tablets daily – two strips of 10 tablets for 56 days!).
What happened to the rabbits receiving ultra-high doses of ivermectin?
The poor little rabbits. After their 56 day trial, they had blood drawn from their hearts for hormone tests. These rabbits were then “sacrificed” and had their liver, kidneys and lungs examined microscopically[3].
Another batch of 48 female rabbits were used for the second experiment. The second batch of rabbits were ‘treated’ the same way as the first batch over 56 days and then mated with fertile male rabbits on two occasions over a two-month period. Most of rabbits receiving ivermectin did not have offspring during those two months.
What can we deduce from this?
Female rabbits given daily ivermectin injections for 56 days at doses 20 times the equivalent dose normally used by humans is associated with infertility in female rabbits up to two months following administration.
Did these female rabbits remain infertile once the ivermectin cleared their system? We don’t know. On the second mating there were more offspring than the first, so with time it is quite likely that fertility might have returned to normal after a time.
Would giving a human female 20 x 12 mg ivermectin tablets a day for 56 days similarly impact fertility? Quite possibly…
Would it be reversible? Quite possibly…we just don’t know because no scientist is likely to do such a study like this in human beings. It would be pointless and dangerous, wouldn’t it?
Can we deduce from this study that ivermectin is an effective eugenics tools for the globalist depopulation agenda? No, I don’t think so.
So we can have a look at the other studies together too - or you can do it yourselves. In general, though, I feel a good dollop of common sense is needed at this stage.
My conclusions related to this one: Animal testing is cruel.
If this study isn’t proof that experimenting on animals should be stopped, I don’t know what is!
In addition, the fact that such a high total dose did not kill the little rabbits seems to prove what pharmacovigilance databases testify to, which is just how SAFE ivermectin is!
Do I think the globalists might try to use ivermectin as part of their depopulation agenda?
Yes, I do. It is clear that the globalists want to get access to our bodies to inject stuff. It occurred to me as far back as 2021 that they may well be planning an ivermectin injection to be rolled out in due course, and we see these being developed by the usual culprits.
So although the answer to the question above is YES, it is not for the reasons put forward; rather because the ivermectin injection deployed by these sociopaths would most likely contain the same harmful nanotechnology as the Covid-19 biotechnology, with LNPs and assorted other toxic ingredients.
I will invite Dr Mike Yeadon to discuss this and other things soon in a public forum so we can explore this and the other interesting matters in this extraordinary time of great change!
https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/is-ivermectin-really-a-genocidal
Animal testing IS so cruel....
Now, what if the psy op goes as deep as Dr.s losing their licenses? What if that was part of it? If so, it was very forward thinking and clever because it seems so implausible that you brought it up as the reason you can't fathom its a nefarious plan at the higher levels... In our opinion it could go very deep down the rabbit hole - just publicize a few Dr.s problems and TA-DA... its a complete narrative and throws everyone off the scent... We want the trials and judges to tell us whats legit after hearing all the evidence, but heavily lean toward believing Dr. Yeadon!
Interest of Justice - You are just repeating a statement of Yeadon. Where is the proof of that? Show me the proof that Ivermectin is an anti fertility drug.
IOJ: While I appreciate very much your pursuit of the gangster class, this line of reason flies in the face of many thousands of lives that WERE saved by the use of those products on people who were indeed quite sick. Multiple doctors have reported that patients recovered quickly after being very ill indeed. Your view here is not helpful, and likely part of a giant psyop intended to keep us opponents of Big Pharma divided. Please escape from that trap. To say thew was no illness is, frankly absurd. I myself, though elderly. was rather ill for 2 weeks but used 'the good stuff" and recovered. So did many others who refused the vax.
It's interesting because we are convinced the illnesses are real, people got sick, but we think it it was always a bad strain of flu. The reason we say that is we learned they always tested for flu in one building but when covid hit they sent everyone to the epidemiologist building to be checked for covid - They no longer checked for flu!!!!!!
They used PCR to check for covid but it made false positives and flu magically went away. It all adds up to people really got sick, but the data shows it was just like every year. As we study the actual data we cant find a rise in actual illness to attribute to covid. It's so easy to say this is a psy op we are sucked into (we WILL continue to learn and get to the bottom of this) but the evidence does not support a real covid pandemic. Thank god you recovered from whatever it was and did not take the "vax"!!!!
Michael Yeadon was a scientific researcher and vice president at drugs giant Pfizer Inc. He co-founded a successful biotech.
Yes and now he's mostly ashamed of the industry as a whole and says he has learned a lot about the inner workings which he was previously unaware of... Courageous and truthful Whistleblowers always come out from the inside of the belly of the Beast - that is where the whistleblowers come from - no real fault of their own, and if there was fault, they rise above, get out and Whistleblow!
total war against all mankind
Bingo! Do I care about their WHY? Hell no, because when its reduced to the simplest form of the answer- because they can.
Is it effective in stopping unwanted horse pregnancies?
hahaaaaaaaahhaaa lol
"Dr. Yeadon asks Dr. Tess Lawrie to publicly to state why she continues to promote “early treatment” for a non-existent illness. Fair question."....AND I am asking the no-virus camp to denounce the shots....why do we need to vaccinate against something that does not exist....right?
Why No Yearly Seasonal Flu ? pre JibJab roll out ,, the makings of a scamdemic !
I suggest you also have a look at the effects on Cholesterol too- as per Mejbcart's most recent stack.
I have been pondering how the MoA of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloraquin since Dec 2020, fit into the BS narratives and planned convid saga- through the already existing BS cholesterol narrative- thats a psyop being going on far longer than Covid.😉
These things are to lower cholesterol levels... now ask why? No not the BS "bad fat" justification. Anyone who thinks about biology of cells, know that you freaking need cholesterol. Then have a look at how cholesterol is activated...😉
#intentionalnotaccidental #theystoleurlight #theystoleUrtime #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
Interesting!
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/the-war-on-human-genes-cholesterol
OMG ,,,, Fooled Again 🤦♀️ ,,,, 🙏 Mike Yeadon & I OJ ,,, ist time I’ve heard this IMPORTANT Info , THANK YOU SO MUCH , unfortunately I too had Ivermectin on list of ‘what to do ‘ despite researching - Fooled Again ,🙏💚
You are most welcome - we thought it's worth sharing, even if it loses us some readers because its obviously so contentious that it makes some people mad! We bought a ton of ivermectin and when we got sick (seemed like mild flu) we took it, but honestly did not notice any miracle cure - it just was a cold for a few days and ivermectin didn't seem to do anything in our experience. We first heard it from Tim Truth and was shocked, but he puts up studies so it's hard not to pay attention and at least research more into it! EVERYTHING is a damn conspiracy - even the fringe conspiracy theories like the government is suppressing ivermectin because it really works - lol - Fooled us all a long time - so we are all speaking out as we wake up. Sage Hanna put it best when asking us to ask ourselves how we became such fierce defenders of a big pharma product in the first place? A well coordinated campaign....
A genuinely good place with good people (and I'm not saying this lightly) to take a deep dive into the very shady world of IVM. See pinned messages as the best source of having it all together.
https://t.me/ivermectinkillz
Wow - appreciated!
"In addition, in tissue culture, at concentrations higher than anthelmintic concentrations, ivermectin shows antiviral, antimalarial, antimetabolic, and anticancer effects."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853155/
While a good pitch for Ivermectin to treat precisely 4 issues, we must ask you to put this in context:
Was covid a virus that viral drugs can fix? Is covid Malaria, a metobolic issue or cancer?
We see 4 uses only for Ivermectin in that article - none of which make sense, especially since covid is not a virus caused set of symptoms. How does this fit in the picture? A bit confused!
In my world Ivermectin was vilified and banned
The real question should be " Is it just ivermectin - or poisoned ivermectin"?
As someone who drenched and used ivermectin pour on for thousands of cattle and sheep and usually got a heavy dose when doing so my questions would be:
why didn't that effect my fertility at all?
why did we not notice any reductions in the breeding of our stock? As farmers any % reduction in fertility would have been noticed - that was the business after all.
I don't doubt at all that the ivermectin and hydroxy were a great reverse psychology psyop but that has to do with these being poisoned with nanotech and not the ivermectin alone. I also don't doubt that the donated ivermectin given to African countries would have had sterility agents added, just as the early donated shots for other purposes did as evidenced by the African church research going way back.
Perhaps this was why the main manufacturers of hydroxy in Canada were murdered just prior to the latest scamdemic. They may not have agreed to a poisoning of their product either.
Yes, I was initially sucked in too and bought ivermectin from India at the early stages, and later on horse paste. After inspecting them we found most were contaminated with the new tech. Even better today is that anyone buying pet or fish medicines have no recourse as they are taking a vet product and this means no liability for the sellers or manufacturers.
The big issue for me is the denial of the tech inside people that is easily proven via that pesky bluetooth signal coming from human bodies. No better smoking gun than that for evidence can be had.
Does unpoisoned ivermectin have a beneficial role to play still for some purposes? Helping to heal the endothelial lining of our veins that are under attack, componants of which are a part of the calamari as per Dr Arne Burkhadt, is the reason I still take it sporadically in an uncontaminated form.
To each his own research.
Do you know that Michael Yeadon was a scientific researcher and vice president at drugs giant Pfizer Inc. He co-founded a successful biotech.
¨If ivermectin was more widely used, there’d be no need for vaccines.¨
Dr Mike Yeadon May 10, 2021
Why are we being lied to about Covid? There’s no good reason By Dr Mike Yeadon - May 10, 2021
BE in no doubt, among the reasons that voices and opinions like mine are never heard in the main media is extreme censorship more suited to China than a liberal democracy. Please allow me to illustrate with an example close to my heart why it is high time for us to change our response.
Ivermectin is one of the WHO’s ‘essential drugs’ which all countries should have access to. It’s very cheap as its patent has long expired; it’s one of the most-used drugs in world history; it’s extraordinarily safe; it is often life-saving against parasitic infections. It is also one of the best-established pharmaceutical treatments for Covid-19, showing benefit in every stage of the disease, in multiple independent clinical trials of varying quality. On January 3, 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie attempted to alert the Prime Minister to the potential of ivermectin.
Her video here was pulled from YouTube within hours of posting, though it survives on Vimeo. The paper by the FLCCC group of US intensivists (whose survival rates for severe Covid-19 are best in class) that was the inspiration for Dr Lawrie’s work was accepted after extensive open peer review (including two career employees of the FDA) and ‘provisionally accepted’ by the ‘open science’ journal Frontiers in Pharmacology. The screenshot of the abstract tweeted by Clare Craig shown here attracted more than 100,000 views. Then, mysteriously, it was rejected and pulled by the Frontiers editor in chief. It is still here in cached form though the Ministry of Truth has been at work and placed it in a memory hole, so no trace survives on Frontiers’ own website.
Intended for a Special Issue on ‘repurposed drugs’ for Covid-19, various guest editors were so incensed at this behaviour that they resigned in protest. You can read their letter here. They concluded that ‘these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by Frontiers.’ Fortunately this major paper is now published by the American Journal of Therapeutics and can be read in its final form here.
This nevertheless successfully delayed by nearly six months its circulation to leading public health bodies starting mid-November. A copy was sent to Sir Jeremy Farrar (boss of the Wellcome Trust and member of Sage) who passed it on to Professor Peter Horby (also on Sage), amongst others, on November 18, 2020. So the efficacy of ivermectin must be well known to the Government’s advisers, but they have done nothing about it. Likewise, the formal and rigorous meta-analysis performed by Dr Tess Lawrie’s team at the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd has been communicated to Matt Hancock, but without reply.
I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, big pharma (here’s Merck, who originally developed & marketed it) and regulatory agencies will tell you is that ivermectin doesn’t work in Covid-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won’t, for I would win easily...¨ Read More
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I've been pointing these things out for years. Every time I do the big pharma shills for Ivermectin come out in force in the comments. No awareness about the terrain.
I see the same is happening here.