FALSE that its not an experiment and that it is a vaccine. IOJ is calling it out to the court today. Will they stop the shots on the spot? Do they want to hear from the experts? What next?
Will be watching the hearing. Very much looking forward to it!
Rumble notes say that Michael Yeadon and Dr. Ana Mihalcea will be testifying. Great choices!
Yet I’m curious to know if you reached out to Katherine Watt (Substack- Bailiwick News) and Sasha Latapova (Substack - Due Diligence and Art) to testify as they have contributed so much with their research, respectively regarding the “dual use” - “countermeasures” - biological weapons, and the fraud that occurred with the “vaccines”. Additionally, I’m wondering if you also reached out to Dr. Francis Boyle to testify (author of the Biological Weapons Act) who has repeatedly talked about the “vaccines” being biological weapons?
And lastly, what about Attorney Todd Callender testifying as he fought the DOD regarding the shots, and who received whistleblower information regarding their lethality?
Yes we are blessed with an extra awesome team of advisor experts - Ana is the best - Sasha and Watts are helping (Watts sent some laws we need) and YES we need to get Francis Boyle on board as we challenge the dual use and the fact these are not regulated as weapons due to misclassified as a vaccine and not properly defined! Thanks for the ideas - 1000% Agreed!
Can I ask who you believe to be controlled opposition in that lady’s list please? Mike Yeadon I trust completely and Sasha but most of the other names I’m not familiar with.
We think they are both solid. We have always trusted Dr. Yeadon from day 1. Hes too authentic Yeadon told us he trusts Sasha 100% and we see she is willing to go to various places to testify about the DoD rules making it so there is no oversight. Fearless warrior in our eyes. Would need reasons not to trust her or Yeadon.
If you trust Yeadon and Sasha Latypova I can't help you. Figure it out on your own or don't. Lots of people no longer trust either one of them. I had a run in with Latypova on the threads of Proton Magic where she was shilling for Ivermectin and viciously attacking anyone who questioned her about it. I was personally attacked by her and defamed for politely asking questions about the possibility that Ivermectin might be intentionally contaminated by big pharma. She refused to answer my questions and went into pit bull mode. She was somehow able to ban me from her stack from comments on Proton Magic's threads. I do not have the ability to do that on my Stack. No one does. But she did it somehow.
If she doesn't want lots of people to think she's an operative, for one thing she can stop attacking Sabrina Wallace and her work. Sabrina is correct about everything she says and Latypova is lying when she claims there is no Internet of Bodies. Latypova continues to lie about these issues concerning the nano tech in the shots and what its there for.
We had to ban some freak that was trolling us so it can be done. Sasha is not special to be able to ban people commenting that bugs her.
1. What makes you think ivermectin is the proper focus, or that its been contaminated? Curious. No idea about Sashas views on internet of bodies but would presume she knows it exists - where does she say it doesn't even exist?
2. Why do you not trust Dr. Yeadon? You plant doubts in peoples minds about him but its baseless unless you provide some reason not to trust the man.
So far these not not really that great of reasons to not trust Sasha or Yeadon. Is there something more compelling?
Fair enough, we have a different opinion but surely you can agree that what is happening in the world and what both Dr Yeadon and others are warning us about is correct and that this is quite simply a cull of the worlds population?
it may be that cloudhub is not getting past the government censorship. There are alot of people in this movement that are not seeing what's being posted - for instance on facebook.
Just read that it was censored on the platform that was streaming it, so there will be an update from Dr. M tomorrow. Way to go, censorship NAZIs, make us MORE pissed off. 🤬
It seems the stream to Vaxxchoice & Rumble made the live stream too glitchy to actually watch or hear while live. On our end we see and hear the video now. Its sabotage!!!!
<They> do their best to defeat us but forget that oppression makes people fight harder for righteousness!! And we have the author of Righteousness on our side!
Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation/G3986 - peirasmos which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. ■ Revelation 3:10, KJV, blueletterbible
■G3986 - peirasmos/temptation
Outline of Biblical Usage:
an experiment, attempt, trial, proving
trial, proving: the trial made of you by my bodily condition, since condition served as to test the love of the Galatians toward Paul (Gal. 4:14)
the trial of man's fidelity, integrity, virtue, constancy
an enticement to sin, temptation, whether arising from the desires or from the outward circumstances
an internal temptation to sin
of the temptation by which the devil sought to divert Jesus the Messiah from his divine errand
of the condition of things, or a mental state, by which we are enticed to sin, or to a lapse from the faith and holiness
adversity, affliction, trouble: sent by God and serving to test or prove one's character, faith, holiness
temptation (i.e. trial) of God by men
rebellion against God, by which his power and justice are, as it were, put to the proof and challenged to show themselves
KJV Translation Count: 21x
The KJV translates Strongs G3986 in the following manner: temptation (19x), temptations (1x), try (1x).
Strong's Definitions: πειρασμός peirasmós, pi-ras-mos'; from G3985; a putting to proof (by experiment (of good), experience (of evil), solicitation, discipline or provocation); by implication, adversity:—temptation, × try.
Communication does wonders. Even a little bit of communication about what happened today serves your followers who tuned in repeatedly over the course of an one or two hours. After the daily build up of this hearing for the last month, I find it difficult to understand why the staffers at interest of justice have not put out some message. Many of us expected that there would be interference. Yet what I didn’t expect was crickets from I/OJ!
I don’t believe my tone, nor my word choice were malicious. I think my points were valid. No person nor organization should be beyond reproach in the same way that no one should be above the law. After so much hype about the hearing, the public deserved an explanation forthwith.
How much time and effort does it take to simply say, “We’re sorry for the failure of the transmission today. We will provide more information tomorrow.” This is the least IOJ should’ve done.
What I meant by the question was, what good would it be, if the court passed a guilty verdict? Guilty of specifically what? Who is guilty? Who would enforce such a verdict and where?
Will be watching the hearing. Very much looking forward to it!
Rumble notes say that Michael Yeadon and Dr. Ana Mihalcea will be testifying. Great choices!
Yet I’m curious to know if you reached out to Katherine Watt (Substack- Bailiwick News) and Sasha Latapova (Substack - Due Diligence and Art) to testify as they have contributed so much with their research, respectively regarding the “dual use” - “countermeasures” - biological weapons, and the fraud that occurred with the “vaccines”. Additionally, I’m wondering if you also reached out to Dr. Francis Boyle to testify (author of the Biological Weapons Act) who has repeatedly talked about the “vaccines” being biological weapons?
And lastly, what about Attorney Todd Callender testifying as he fought the DOD regarding the shots, and who received whistleblower information regarding their lethality?
Possibility!
Yes we are blessed with an extra awesome team of advisor experts - Ana is the best - Sasha and Watts are helping (Watts sent some laws we need) and YES we need to get Francis Boyle on board as we challenge the dual use and the fact these are not regulated as weapons due to misclassified as a vaccine and not properly defined! Thanks for the ideas - 1000% Agreed!
You certainly wouldn't want to leave out any of the major controlled opposition agents would you? This is all a Psyop. It's why no one can see it.
Can I ask who you believe to be controlled opposition in that lady’s list please? Mike Yeadon I trust completely and Sasha but most of the other names I’m not familiar with.
We think they are both solid. We have always trusted Dr. Yeadon from day 1. Hes too authentic Yeadon told us he trusts Sasha 100% and we see she is willing to go to various places to testify about the DoD rules making it so there is no oversight. Fearless warrior in our eyes. Would need reasons not to trust her or Yeadon.
If you trust Yeadon and Sasha Latypova I can't help you. Figure it out on your own or don't. Lots of people no longer trust either one of them. I had a run in with Latypova on the threads of Proton Magic where she was shilling for Ivermectin and viciously attacking anyone who questioned her about it. I was personally attacked by her and defamed for politely asking questions about the possibility that Ivermectin might be intentionally contaminated by big pharma. She refused to answer my questions and went into pit bull mode. She was somehow able to ban me from her stack from comments on Proton Magic's threads. I do not have the ability to do that on my Stack. No one does. But she did it somehow.
If she doesn't want lots of people to think she's an operative, for one thing she can stop attacking Sabrina Wallace and her work. Sabrina is correct about everything she says and Latypova is lying when she claims there is no Internet of Bodies. Latypova continues to lie about these issues concerning the nano tech in the shots and what its there for.
We had to ban some freak that was trolling us so it can be done. Sasha is not special to be able to ban people commenting that bugs her.
1. What makes you think ivermectin is the proper focus, or that its been contaminated? Curious. No idea about Sashas views on internet of bodies but would presume she knows it exists - where does she say it doesn't even exist?
2. Why do you not trust Dr. Yeadon? You plant doubts in peoples minds about him but its baseless unless you provide some reason not to trust the man.
So far these not not really that great of reasons to not trust Sasha or Yeadon. Is there something more compelling?
Fair enough, we have a different opinion but surely you can agree that what is happening in the world and what both Dr Yeadon and others are warning us about is correct and that this is quite simply a cull of the worlds population?
Can’t see the livestream on Todd’s account.
Yup, same disappointment here!
F
A
K
E
are you in Canada ?
yes
it may be that cloudhub is not getting past the government censorship. There are alot of people in this movement that are not seeing what's being posted - for instance on facebook.
Thank you. Darn!
Just read that it was censored on the platform that was streaming it, so there will be an update from Dr. M tomorrow. Way to go, censorship NAZIs, make us MORE pissed off. 🤬
Where did you read that?
Vaxxchoice
Dr. Ana will be on Todd Callender’s show tomorrow 11/10/23 with information
It seems the stream to Vaxxchoice & Rumble made the live stream too glitchy to actually watch or hear while live. On our end we see and hear the video now. Its sabotage!!!!
<They> do their best to defeat us but forget that oppression makes people fight harder for righteousness!! And we have the author of Righteousness on our side!
Well said!
Any updates? Nothing happening on Todd's site.
God bless 🙏
Thanks for sending out the updated links.
Is the hearing running late? Not getting any image or sound.
Can somebody give me an update please?
I have picture but sound goes off after a millisecond.
It only gave me a millisecond of seeing something and then freezes or drops the picture
Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation/G3986 - peirasmos which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. ■ Revelation 3:10, KJV, blueletterbible
■G3986 - peirasmos/temptation
Outline of Biblical Usage:
an experiment, attempt, trial, proving
trial, proving: the trial made of you by my bodily condition, since condition served as to test the love of the Galatians toward Paul (Gal. 4:14)
the trial of man's fidelity, integrity, virtue, constancy
an enticement to sin, temptation, whether arising from the desires or from the outward circumstances
an internal temptation to sin
of the temptation by which the devil sought to divert Jesus the Messiah from his divine errand
of the condition of things, or a mental state, by which we are enticed to sin, or to a lapse from the faith and holiness
adversity, affliction, trouble: sent by God and serving to test or prove one's character, faith, holiness
temptation (i.e. trial) of God by men
rebellion against God, by which his power and justice are, as it were, put to the proof and challenged to show themselves
KJV Translation Count: 21x
The KJV translates Strongs G3986 in the following manner: temptation (19x), temptations (1x), try (1x).
Strong's Definitions: πειρασμός peirasmós, pi-ras-mos'; from G3985; a putting to proof (by experiment (of good), experience (of evil), solicitation, discipline or provocation); by implication, adversity:—temptation, × try.
What time???
10:30 Eastern
The video will not play!! I have shared the link to the Rumble site, but no one is able to wtch it.
Thank you Ana!! . Much appreciated.
I can see a video of it, but in Spanish. And the sound is very bad.
IOJ are you going to tell all of us what happened with the two livestream links that did not work for anybody today?
Communication does wonders. Even a little bit of communication about what happened today serves your followers who tuned in repeatedly over the course of an one or two hours. After the daily build up of this hearing for the last month, I find it difficult to understand why the staffers at interest of justice have not put out some message. Many of us expected that there would be interference. Yet what I didn’t expect was crickets from I/OJ!
Please give these folks a little grace…they are doing their best under challenging circumstances.
I don’t believe my tone, nor my word choice were malicious. I think my points were valid. No person nor organization should be beyond reproach in the same way that no one should be above the law. After so much hype about the hearing, the public deserved an explanation forthwith.
How much time and effort does it take to simply say, “We’re sorry for the failure of the transmission today. We will provide more information tomorrow.” This is the least IOJ should’ve done.
If we've been blocked from the Hearing, might not references to the Hearing also be blocked by algorithms?
Nobody could watch the live stream from either link. wt?
I couldn't get the live-streams, how can I listen to them, I do not have Rumble
It’s not playing
Looks like the hearing has already happened, but we can’t even access the replay. Can we please get some updates?
What can be expected for results?
Tomorrow
More specifically?
Vaxxchoice
Dr. Ana will be on Todd Callender’s show tomorrow 11/10/23 with information
What I meant by the question was, what good would it be, if the court passed a guilty verdict? Guilty of specifically what? Who is guilty? Who would enforce such a verdict and where?